Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) 2024 10-K Earnings Analysis
Tesla, Inc.2024 Earnings Analysis
65/100
Tesla's FY2024 tells a story of margin collapse masked by topline stability. Revenue grew just 1% YoY to $97.7B while net income was cut in half from $15.0B to $7.1B — the direct consequence of aggressive price cuts that compressed gross margins from 25.6% (FY2022) to 17.9%. The fortress balance sheet ($16.1B cash, $5.5B debt) buys time, but the trajectory of declining returns (ROE: 28.1% → 9.7% in two years) suggests Tesla is pricing for volume at the expense of profitability.
Filing analysis
Tesla, Inc. 2024 10-K Analysis
This page reads Tesla, Inc.'s 2024 10-K annual report through the EarningsMoat framework: earnings quality, economic moat strength, capital allocation, and key risks. The current overall score is 65/100, or grade D.
TSLA Earnings Quality
The earnings-quality module scores 58/100, with Gross Margin: 17.9%, CF/Net Income: 2.10x. The core question is whether reported profit is backed by operating cash flow and recurring business economics. See the earnings quality analysis guide.
TSLA Economic Moat Analysis
The moat-strength module scores 62/100, with ROE: 9.7%, Gross Margin: 17.9%. The test is whether the advantage can protect returns after competitors react. Read the economic moat analysis guide.
TSLA Free Cash Flow vs Net Income
CF/Net Income: 2.10x, Free Cash Flow: $3.6B is the fastest read on whether accounting earnings turn into cash. The capital-allocation module scores 68/100. For the diagnostic, start with cash flow vs net income.
TSLA Key Risks from the Annual Report
The risk module scores 72/100, with Debt Ratio: 39.6%, Cash/Debt: 2.92x. The goal is to separate ordinary disclosure from risks that can change margins, cash flow, leverage, or the moat itself.
Is TSLA a High Quality Earnings Stock?
Based on this 2024 filing, TSLA needs a closer read before it qualifies as a high-quality earnings candidate: the overall grade is D, and the earnings-quality score is 58/100. This is a research screen, not investment advice.
Read the report first
Understand Tesla, Inc. first, then decide if it belongs on your watchlist
The TSLA score, explanation, management facts, and filing sources are all here. When you want to follow more companies, review new-filing changes, or keep notes for the next review, keep more names in your watchlist.
Read the report first
Understand the company first. Keep up with every filing as your list grows.
A single report helps you judge one company. As your watchlist grows, review score, cash flow, moat, and risk changes together instead of repeating the same work.
Keep more names together
When your list grows, keep TSLA with the rest of your names and review score, grade, and risk changes over time.
See how to track more namesAsk follow-up questions
Dig into cash conversion, moat evidence, capital allocation, and risk changes without rereading the full 10-K.
Ask a questionExport and revisit records
Save the TSLA report as research notes you can revisit before the next filing.
Save research notesCore Dimension Scores
Evaluating competitive strength across earnings quality, moat strength, and risk sustainability
Overall Score Trend
Earnings Quality
Gross margin collapsed from 25.6% (FY2022) to 17.9% — a 770bps decline in two years driven by aggressive vehicle price cuts. Below the 20% threshold that signals weak pricing power.
CF/NI of 2.10x appears strong but is misleading. OCF of $14.9B is propped up by heavy depreciation on Tesla's $122B asset base, while net income collapsed from $15.0B to $7.1B. The ratio is high because the denominator shrank, not because cash generation improved.
Operating income of $7.1B equals net income, indicating profits are fully from core operations with no non-operating income inflation.
SG&A + R&D at 9.9% of revenue is highly efficient, reflecting Tesla's direct sales model and lean cost structure. However, low expenses couldn't offset gross margin deterioration.
FCF of $3.6B represents just 3.7% of revenue and declined 53% from FY2022's $7.6B. For a company valued as a high-growth tech firm, this cash generation is anemic.
Tesla's earnings quality scores 58/100 — a sharp decline from FY2022. The headline is gross margin collapse: 25.6% → 18.2% → 17.9% over three years. Net income was cut in half from $15.0B to $7.1B while revenue barely grew. The 2.10x CF/NI ratio masks reality — it's elevated because NI cratered while depreciation-heavy OCF held steady. FCF of $3.6B on $97.7B revenue is a 3.7% FCF margin, dangerously thin. Per the FY2024 10-K operating-expense disclosures, the 9.9% expense ratio is low relative to traditional automakers based on publicly-comparable 10-K operating-expense ratios.
Moat Strength
ROE plummeted from 28.1% (FY2022) to 9.7% — barely exceeding cost of capital. This undermines the case for a wide economic moat.
Below 20% is a red flag for moat analysis. Tesla's willingness to sacrifice margins for volume suggests brand premium hasn't translated into durable pricing power.
Low expenses signal genuine scale advantages. Tesla's vertically integrated model and direct sales bypass traditional dealer costs.
Most Tesla sales are direct-to-consumer with immediate payment, resulting in minimal receivables and strong bargaining power.
Tesla's moat scores 62/100 — moderate but deteriorating. The brand remains iconic and the Supercharger network is a genuine competitive asset, but ROE collapsed from 28.1% to 9.7% and gross margins at 17.9% are now below traditional automaker levels. The company chose to slash prices rather than defend margins, suggesting the brand moat is narrower than bulls believe. Positive: 9.9% expense ratio and 4.5% receivable ratio reflect genuine operational scale.
Capital Allocation
CapEx of $11.3B (11.6% of revenue) reflects heavy investment in Gigafactories, energy storage, and AI/robotics. Capital-intensive but strategically directed.
FCF declined from $7.6B (FY2022) to $3.6B despite stable revenue. FCF margin of 3.7% leaves minimal buffer.
Per the FY2024 cash flow statement, FCF covers 51% of net income, with the balance absorbed by capex.
Cash of $16.1B covers $5.5B debt nearly 3x with zero short-term debt. Fortress balance sheet provides substantial cushion.
Capital allocation scores 68/100. The fortress balance sheet ($16.1B cash vs $5.5B debt) provides ample cushion. Per the FY2022-FY2024 cash flow statements, FCF has compressed from $7.6B in FY2022 to $3.6B in FY2024 while capex has remained around $11B per the same disclosures. Per the FY2024 cash flow statement, the 0.51x FCF-to-NI ratio means roughly half of reported earnings convert to distributable cash. Tesla is clearly in investment mode — Megafactory, AI training, Optimus — but declining FCF raises questions about return on these investments.
Key Risks
Debt ratio at 39.6% is conservative for a capital-intensive manufacturer. Equity of $72.9B significantly exceeds liabilities of $48.4B.
Cash covers long-term debt nearly 3x. Even in a severe downturn, Tesla faces minimal liquidity risk.
Virtually zero goodwill means no impairment risk. Tesla has grown almost entirely organically.
The 770bps gross margin decline (FY2022-2024) is the biggest risk. If price competition intensifies, auto segment margins could breach breakeven.
Risk profile scores 72/100 (higher = safer). Balance sheet is clean: per the FY2024 10-K, 39.6% debt ratio, 2.92x cash coverage, zero goodwill. However, the margin trajectory is the critical risk — 770bps decline in two years with no evidence of stabilization. NI halved while revenue stagnated. The structural risk isn't insolvency — it's permanent loss of pricing power in the core auto business as Chinese EV competitors undercut on price.
Management
Ask about this section
Ask one question here. Keep digging when the issue needs more work.
This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.