NIKE, Inc. (NKE) 2024 10-K Earnings Analysis
NIKE, Inc.2024 Earnings Analysis
78/100
Nike's FY2024 10-K (fiscal year ended May 31, 2024) captures a year of transition: revenue of $51.4B was roughly flat and net income of $5.7B at 11.0% margin reflects mid-cycle pressure from inventory digestion, China market softness, and direct-to-consumer (NIKE Direct) growth offsetting wholesale channel declines. Gross margin of 44.6% is solid brand-driven pricing. The 39.5% ROE is aided by buyback-reduced equity ($14.4B), though not to the extreme of MCD/HD. The 10-K frames Nike as placing 'considerable emphasis on innovation and high-quality construction' — the brand premium rests on this continuous-innovation cadence. FY2024 marked the end of a multi-year lifestyle-driven growth cycle; management has pivoted toward performance + running focus.
Filing analysis
NIKE, Inc. 2024 10-K Analysis
This page reads NIKE, Inc.'s 2024 10-K annual report through the EarningsMoat framework: earnings quality, economic moat strength, capital allocation, and key risks. The current overall score is 78/100, or grade C.
NKE Earnings Quality
The earnings-quality module scores 78/100, with Gross Margin: 44.6%, CF/Net Income: 1.30x. The core question is whether reported profit is backed by operating cash flow and recurring business economics. See the earnings quality analysis guide.
NKE Economic Moat Analysis
The moat-strength module scores 88/100, with Brand: Iconic, Innovation Cadence: Structural. The test is whether the advantage can protect returns after competitors react. Read the economic moat analysis guide.
NKE Free Cash Flow vs Net Income
CF/Net Income: 1.30x is the fastest read on whether accounting earnings turn into cash. The capital-allocation module scores 78/100. For the diagnostic, start with cash flow vs net income.
NKE Key Risks from the Annual Report
The risk module scores 66/100, with China Market Softness: Multi-year, Lifestyle Cycle Turn: Active. The goal is to separate ordinary disclosure from risks that can change margins, cash flow, leverage, or the moat itself.
Is NKE a High Quality Earnings Stock?
Based on this 2024 filing, NKE needs a closer read before it qualifies as a high-quality earnings candidate: the overall grade is C, and the earnings-quality score is 78/100. This is a research screen, not investment advice.
Read the report first
Understand NIKE, Inc. first, then decide if it belongs on your watchlist
The NKE score, explanation, management facts, and filing sources are all here. When you want to follow more companies, review new-filing changes, or keep notes for the next review, keep more names in your watchlist.
Read the report first
Understand the company first. Keep up with every filing as your list grows.
A single report helps you judge one company. As your watchlist grows, review score, cash flow, moat, and risk changes together instead of repeating the same work.
Keep more names together
When your list grows, keep NKE with the rest of your names and review score, grade, and risk changes over time.
See how to track more namesAsk follow-up questions
Dig into cash conversion, moat evidence, capital allocation, and risk changes without rereading the full 10-K.
Ask a questionExport and revisit records
Save the NKE report as research notes you can revisit before the next filing.
Save research notesCore Dimension Scores
Evaluating competitive strength across earnings quality, moat strength, and risk sustainability
Overall Score Trend
Earnings Quality
44.6% gross margin — healthy for branded apparel/footwear, above adidas (~48% but with different mix) and well above private-label/department-store exposure. Nike's direct-to-consumer channel carries higher GM than wholesale, so NIKE Direct mix shift is margin-accretive over time.
OCF of $7.4B against NI of $5.7B = 1.30x — clean conversion with D&A on owned retail + infrastructure boosting cash vs GAAP. Earnings are real cash, not accrual-dependent.
Revenue of $51.4B in FY2024 was roughly flat vs FY2023's $51.2B. This masks a mix shift: NIKE Direct grew while wholesale declined, and Greater China weakened while North America held. Overall comparable growth was muted vs the 2020-2022 lifestyle-driven surge.
11.0% net margin is below Nike's mid-teens historical norm. SG&A (marketing + sports partnerships + demand creation) remained heavy while revenue was flat; inventory markdowns in select categories compressed margin further. Recovery depends on sell-through normalization.
Earnings quality scores 78/100. 44.6% GM + 1.30x CF/NI confirm the underlying brand economics remain intact. The FY2024 weakness is cyclical (inventory digestion, China softness, lifestyle cycle turning) not structural. Underlying earnings power is higher than the headline 11% net margin suggests; normalization depends on management's product-cycle reboot playing through 2025-2026.
Moat Strength
The Swoosh is one of the most recognized logos globally. Nike's brand partnerships (Jordan, major athletes, leagues, Olympics) and the Jordan Brand subsidiary (focused on basketball performance + culture) command premium pricing that competitors cannot replicate without decades of investment.
The 10-K describes Nike as placing 'considerable emphasis on innovation and high-quality construction in the development and manufacturing of our products.' Air, Flyknit, React, ZoomX, Adapt — each technology platform has compounded the brand's premium position over decades. R&D + design is the moat's engine.
Nike has multi-decade athlete-endorsement contracts (LeBron, Ronaldo, Williams, Woods) + team/league outfitter deals (NFL, MLB, NBA uniforms; Brazil soccer; Olympic teams). The sports-marketing spend base is 2-3x competitors' — a structural spend advantage.
Nike's direct-to-consumer channel (digital + Nike-owned stores) has grown to ~44% of revenue, up from ~24% a decade ago. DTC carries higher GM + better customer-data economics than wholesale. The channel shift is structurally margin-accretive.
Moat strength scores 88/100. Brand + innovation cadence + sports-marketing scale combine into a deep competitive moat. Jordan Brand alone (~$7B revenue) is a category-leading franchise within Nike. The DTC mix shift compounds the moat by adding direct customer relationships. Competitors (Adidas, Puma, On, Hoka) take slices but no single player challenges across all categories simultaneously.
Capital Allocation
FCF of $6.6B = 12.8% FCF margin. Down from peak levels but adequate to fund ~$2B dividend + ~$5B buybacks. Asset-light business model (outsourced manufacturing) keeps CapEx low ~$800M.
ROE of 39.5% is solid without being in negative-equity territory. Equity of $14.4B against liabilities of $23.5B gives a debt ratio of 62% — moderate. Nike has been active in buybacks but not to the buyback-extremism of MCD/HD.
Nike has raised dividends for 22+ consecutive years with mid-to-high-single-digit growth. Annual payout ~$2B is well-covered by $6.6B FCF.
Goodwill of just ~$300M = 1% of assets — essentially zero M&A history. Nike has grown organically through brand-building + product innovation, avoiding the acquisition-driven strategies of many consumer peers. No impairment risk, no integration burden.
Capital allocation scores 78/100. Nike's capital discipline is conservative relative to peers — moderate leverage, consistent dividends, no goodwill buildup. The absence of major M&A is a feature, not a bug — it preserves focus on brand + product. The 39.5% ROE is real return efficiency, not balance-sheet engineering. Buybacks have been disciplined, accelerating EPS growth above net income growth without pushing equity toward zero.
Key Risks
Greater China revenue has been under pressure for multiple years — local competitors (Li-Ning, Anta with Fila/Amer Sports) have grown share, consumer spending has weakened post-Covid, and political/cultural frictions have intermittently hurt foreign brands. Structural category rebalancing is ongoing.
Classic lifestyle franchises (Air Force 1, Dunks, Air Jordan 1s) have been heavy revenue drivers for 4+ years. Fashion cycles turn; inventory built for sustained lifestyle demand may need markdowns as consumers rotate to newer silhouettes or competitors (Hoka, On for performance running).
Nike pulled back from several wholesale accounts (Foot Locker partial, smaller retailers) in recent years to push NIKE Direct. This created near-term revenue friction as wholesale partners recalibrated. Management has begun reversing some of this pullback in FY2024.
On Running's Cloudrunner and Hoka's maximalist foam have taken meaningful share in performance running. Adidas has rebounded with Samba lifestyle. Nike's product innovation cadence needs to continue compounding to maintain brand premium.
Risk profile scores 66/100 (higher = safer). China is the largest durable pressure. Lifestyle-cycle turn + wholesale-reset are self-inflicted but manageable. Performance-running competitive share (Hoka, On) is the new front. Nike's brand is wide enough to absorb these individually; compound pressure has kept multiples compressed vs historical norms.
Management
Ask about this section
Ask one question here. Keep digging when the issue needs more work.
This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.