Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) 2024 10-K Earnings Analysis
Starbucks Corporation2024 Earnings Analysis
71/100
Starbucks' FY2024 10-K (fiscal year ended September 29, 2024) captures a turnaround year: revenue of $36.2B was modestly lower than FY2023 and net income of $3.8B at 10.4% net margin reflects softening US + China same-store sales pressure. Gross margin not meaningfully computed due to service-business nature of the model. The 10-K references the 'Back to Starbucks plan' — Brian Niccol's turnaround framework after he joined as CEO in September 2024. Negative equity of -$7.4B (124% debt ratio) is the signature of years of buyback-financed shareholder returns, similar to MCD and HD. Starbucks' brand + real-estate + mobile-order ecosystem remain the defensible moat; turnaround execution under Niccol is the FY2025 investment thesis.
Filing analysis
Starbucks Corporation 2024 10-K Analysis
This page reads Starbucks Corporation's 2024 10-K annual report through the EarningsMoat framework: earnings quality, economic moat strength, capital allocation, and key risks. The current overall score is 71/100, or grade C.
SBUX Earnings Quality
The earnings-quality module scores 72/100, with Revenue Soft: $36.2B, Net Margin: 10.4%. The core question is whether reported profit is backed by operating cash flow and recurring business economics. See the earnings quality analysis guide.
SBUX Economic Moat Analysis
The moat-strength module scores 85/100, with Brand Premium: Iconic, Real Estate Density: ~40,000 stores. The test is whether the advantage can protect returns after competitors react. Read the economic moat analysis guide.
SBUX Free Cash Flow vs Net Income
CF/Net Income: 1.62x is the fastest read on whether accounting earnings turn into cash. The capital-allocation module scores 68/100. For the diagnostic, start with cash flow vs net income.
SBUX Key Risks from the Annual Report
The risk module scores 58/100, with Niccol Turnaround Execution: Defining, China Market: Luckin pressure. The goal is to separate ordinary disclosure from risks that can change margins, cash flow, leverage, or the moat itself.
Is SBUX a High Quality Earnings Stock?
Based on this 2024 filing, SBUX needs a closer read before it qualifies as a high-quality earnings candidate: the overall grade is C, and the earnings-quality score is 72/100. This is a research screen, not investment advice.
Read the report first
Understand Starbucks Corporation first, then decide if it belongs on your watchlist
The SBUX score, explanation, management facts, and filing sources are all here. When you want to follow more companies, review new-filing changes, or keep notes for the next review, keep more names in your watchlist.
Read the report first
Understand the company first. Keep up with every filing as your list grows.
A single report helps you judge one company. As your watchlist grows, review score, cash flow, moat, and risk changes together instead of repeating the same work.
Keep more names together
When your list grows, keep SBUX with the rest of your names and review score, grade, and risk changes over time.
See how to track more namesAsk follow-up questions
Dig into cash conversion, moat evidence, capital allocation, and risk changes without rereading the full 10-K.
Ask a questionExport and revisit records
Save the SBUX report as research notes you can revisit before the next filing.
Save research notesCore Dimension Scores
Evaluating competitive strength across earnings quality, moat strength, and risk sustainability
Overall Score Trend
Earnings Quality
Revenue of $36.2B was modestly lower vs FY2023's $36.0B — essentially flat. Per the FY2024 10-K segment disclosures, US comparable store sales declined approximately 2% and China comparable store sales declined approximately 8% during the year. Pricing carried revenue growth for years post-Covid; value-conscious consumer pushback + competitive intensity eroded this through FY2024.
10.4% net margin is solid for restaurant/QSR — reflects Starbucks' premium pricing + high-margin cold beverages (cold brews, refreshers) + store productivity. Lower than MCD's 31.5% because Starbucks is company-operated-heavy (not franchise-royalty) and carries labor + real estate directly.
OCF of $6.1B against NI of $3.8B = 1.62x — clean conversion elevated by D&A on owned store fleet (thousands of locations, equipment, technology infrastructure). Real cash generation exceeds GAAP NI.
Starbucks Rewards + mobile ordering has reached ~30% of US transactions and is a durable behavioral moat. Customer loyalty + pre-paid stored value + personalized offers give Starbucks direct customer relationships that most QSR peers lack.
Earnings quality scores 72/100. Revenue flatness is the FY2024 concern. 1.62x CF/NI shows underlying cash generation holds up; the stores remain profitable operating units. Mobile order + Rewards is the defensible advantage vs traditional QSR. The business is slowing, not broken; Niccol's turnaround must reaccelerate same-store sales to validate the moat.
Moat Strength
Starbucks is the global leader in premium coffee retail — the brand commands $5-7 per drink pricing where a commodity coffee costs cents. Multi-decade brand investment + consistent quality + the third-place positioning make Starbucks the aspirational coffee occasion globally.
Per the FY2024 10-K, Starbucks operated roughly 40,000 stores globally with the company-operated vs. licensed split disclosed in the segment footnote. Density in prime urban corridors + suburban retail centers creates convenience barriers competitors can't easily replicate. Expansion cadence has slowed as mature markets saturate.
Starbucks Rewards has 30M+ active members in the US alone generating ~60% of US revenue. The app + pre-paid stored value + personalized offers create switching costs — changing coffee brands means losing points balances + customization preferences.
Per the FY2024 10-K supply-chain disclosures, Starbucks maintains direct-source coffee relationships across origin countries including Ethiopia, Colombia, Guatemala, and Vietnam. Scale gives pricing and quality advantages vs smaller chains that source through commodity markets.
Moat strength scores 85/100. Brand + real-estate density + Rewards ecosystem + supply-chain scale combine into a wide but tested moat. FY2024 same-store weakness doesn't destroy the moat but shows the limits: premium pricing has real ceilings in value-conscious macro environments. China competition (Luckin's dominance) + US value pushback are the acute pressures. The underlying franchise remains one of consumer's most enduring brands.
Capital Allocation
FCF of $3.3B on $36.2B revenue = 9.1% FCF margin. Meaningful capital investment in store remodels + technology (mobile ordering infrastructure, drive-thru automation). FCF coverage of $2.4B annual dividend is 1.4x — tighter than historical norms.
Equity of -$7.4B reflects decades of aggressive buybacks returning more than retained earnings to shareholders. Like McDonald's, Starbucks is in extreme-buyback territory. Not a going-concern issue at current FCF but leaves zero cushion for prolonged earnings decline.
Starbucks has raised dividends for 14+ consecutive years (from 2010 initiation). Annual payout of ~$2.6B. The recent pace of increases has moderated as same-store softness pressures cash flow coverage. Niccol has publicly committed to dividend maintenance.
Debt ratio above 100% reflects negative equity — LTD of $15.0B + operating lease liabilities dominate a balance sheet that's been shrunk by buybacks. Credit metrics remain investment grade but thinner buffer than pre-buyback-era Starbucks.
Capital allocation scores 68/100. Like McDonald's and Home Depot, Starbucks has gone far down the buyback-financed equity-return path. It's delivered for shareholders over 10+ years; the cost is near-zero balance-sheet cushion. FY2024's same-store weakness coincides with Niccol's arrival — turnaround playbook needs to work, or buybacks must moderate to protect dividend + debt metrics.
Key Risks
Per Starbucks's August 2024 press release announcing his appointment, Brian Niccol joined as CEO in September 2024, transitioning from Chipotle per his biographical disclosure. The 10-K references the 'Back to Starbucks plan' — Niccol's framework to return to coffee-first positioning (simplify menu, reduce mobile-order complexity, improve store ambiance, partner labor experience). Execution timeline is 18-24 months; success is not guaranteed.
Luckin Coffee surpassed Starbucks in China store count and revenue in 2023-2024. Starbucks' China same-store sales fell ~8% in FY2024 as Luckin's aggressive pricing + local innovation captured share. China was supposed to be Starbucks' growth engine; the narrative is in question.
Per Starbucks Workers United public announcements and NLRB public dockets, the union has organized at several hundred US store locations since 2021. Contract negotiations remain contested. NLRB complaints + litigation costs add operational friction. Niccol has signaled a partner-experience focus that may include better dialogue with union.
Post-Covid price increases (2019-2024 cumulative ~40%+) have pushed Starbucks out of value-perception for price-sensitive consumers. Dunkin, local cafes, McCafe, and QSR coffee are taking marginal share. Recovery depends on Niccol's value-menu repositioning + perceived brand worth.
Risk profile scores 58/100 (higher = safer) — one of the lower scores in this batch. Niccol turnaround execution is the dominant FY2025-26 variable; without reacceleration, the premium multiple compresses. China is structurally challenged by Luckin's scale advantage. Negative-equity balance sheet amplifies all downside. The business is defensible but in a meaningful transition with execution-dependent outcomes.
Management
Ask about this section
Ask one question here. Keep digging when the issue needs more work.
This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.