PPG INDUSTRIES, INC. (PPG) 2025 10-K Earnings Analysis
PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.2025 Earnings Analysis
60/100
FY2024 → FY2025 Year-over-Year
vs prior annual reportIn FY2025, PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.'s free cash flow grew 66.4% to $1.2B and net income grew 41.2% to $1.6B, while overall score dropped 16 to 60 and gross margin contracted 0.3pp to 41.3%.
PPG Industries' FY2025 10-K reveals a global coatings leader with steady but unspectacular economics: $15.9B revenue with 41.3% gross margin, $1.6B net income (9.9% net margin), and $1.9B OCF demonstrate the pricing power of specialized paints and coatings. The moat is moderate — PPG competes in a fragmented industry as a global leader but lacks the monopolistic economics of a true wide-moat business. FCF of $1.2B ($1.9B OCF minus $778M capex) provides moderate capital return capacity. The 64.1% debt ratio and $6.1B goodwill (27.8% of assets) from acquisition-driven growth warrant monitoring.
Filing analysis
PPG INDUSTRIES, INC. 2025 10-K Analysis
This page reads PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.'s 2025 10-K annual report through the EarningsMoat framework: earnings quality, economic moat strength, capital allocation, and key risks. The current overall score is 60/100, or grade D.
PPG Earnings Quality
The earnings-quality module scores 70/100, with Gross Margin: 41.3%, CF/Net Income: 1.23x. The core question is whether reported profit is backed by operating cash flow and recurring business economics. See the earnings quality analysis guide.
PPG Economic Moat Analysis
The moat-strength module scores 60/100, with Market Position: 70/100, Specification/Formulation Advantage: 65/100. The test is whether the advantage can protect returns after competitors react. Read the economic moat analysis guide.
PPG Free Cash Flow vs Net Income
CF/Net Income: 1.23x is the fastest read on whether accounting earnings turn into cash. The capital-allocation module scores 65/100. For the diagnostic, start with cash flow vs net income.
PPG Key Risks from the Annual Report
The risk module scores 45/100, with Raw Material Costs: Medium, Cyclical End-Markets: Medium. The goal is to separate ordinary disclosure from risks that can change margins, cash flow, leverage, or the moat itself.
Is PPG a High Quality Earnings Stock?
Based on this 2025 filing, PPG needs a closer read before it qualifies as a high-quality earnings candidate: the overall grade is D, and the earnings-quality score is 70/100. This is a research screen, not investment advice.
Read the report first
Understand PPG INDUSTRIES, INC. first, then decide if it belongs on your watchlist
The PPG score, explanation, management facts, and filing sources are all here. When you want to follow more companies, review new-filing changes, or keep notes for the next review, keep more names in your watchlist.
Read the report first
Understand the company first. Keep up with every filing as your list grows.
A single report helps you judge one company. As your watchlist grows, review score, cash flow, moat, and risk changes together instead of repeating the same work.
Keep more names together
When your list grows, keep PPG with the rest of your names and review score, grade, and risk changes over time.
See how to track more namesAsk follow-up questions
Dig into cash conversion, moat evidence, capital allocation, and risk changes without rereading the full 10-K.
Ask a questionExport and revisit records
Save the PPG report as research notes you can revisit before the next filing.
Save research notesCore Dimension Scores
Evaluating competitive strength across earnings quality, moat strength, and risk sustainability
Overall Score Trend
Earnings Quality
Gross margin of 41.3% on $15.9B revenue reflects PPG's specialization premium in paints, coatings and specialty products. The three-segment structure — Global Architectural Coatings, Performance Coatings, Industrial Coatings — provides diversification across end-markets but the blended margin is average for specialty chemicals.
OCF of $1.9B against NI of $1.6B yields a healthy 1.23x conversion ratio, confirming earnings are well-backed by cash. The moderate spread is driven by depreciation/amortization of acquired assets from PPG's acquisition history.
ROE of 19.8% on $7.9B equity reflects solid capital efficiency. The 64.1% debt ratio provides moderate leverage that enhances returns. This ROE level is respectable for an industrial specialty company and demonstrates effective capital deployment.
Goodwill of $6.1B represents 27.8% of $22.1B total assets, reflecting PPG's acquisition-driven growth strategy. Multiple brand acquisitions (COMEX, Tikkurila, etc.) have built the global platform but create impairment risk if regional markets underperform.
Earnings quality scores 70/100 — PPG generates solid cash-backed earnings with a 1.23x CF/NI ratio and 19.8% ROE. The 41.3% gross margin is adequate but not exceptional, reflecting the competitive nature of coatings. The 27.8% goodwill from acquisitions is the primary quality concern.
Moat Strength
PPG is a 'global leader that markets and sells in more than 50 countries' in paints, coatings and specialty products. The 10-K lists major global competitors including Akzo Nobel, Hempel, Nippon Paint, Jotun Group, and Sherwin-Williams. PPG is a leader but in a fragmented, competitive industry.
PPG's Performance Coatings and Industrial Coatings segments sell 'highly-specified, differentiated products' with 'technology-advantaged solutions integrated into OEM customers' operations.' Once specified into an aerospace or automotive OEM's process, switching costs are meaningful but not insurmountable.
PPG operates a diverse brand portfolio including COMEX, PPG, Glidden, Sigma, Tikkurila, and many regional brands across architectural, automotive refinish, aerospace, and industrial segments. Brand recognition varies by region and end-market, providing moderate pricing power.
Moat strength scores 60/100 — PPG has a moderate moat built on specification advantages in performance/industrial coatings and brand recognition in architectural. The industry is competitive with several global players, limiting any single company's pricing power. The moat is stable but not widening.
Capital Allocation
Capital expenditure of $778M on $15.9B revenue (4.9%) is moderate, reflecting PPG's manufacturing-intensive but not capital-heavy business model. The resulting $1.2B FCF supports dividends, buybacks, and bolt-on acquisitions.
PPG has grown through acquisitions (Tikkurila, COMEX, and others), accumulating $6.1B in goodwill. The strategy has built global scale but the 27.8% goodwill/assets ratio requires disciplined acquisition pricing going forward.
Total debt ratio of 64.1% with $7.3B long-term debt is manageable given the stable cash generation but limits financial flexibility for large acquisitions. The debt primarily reflects acquisition financing.
Capital allocation scores 65/100 — PPG's acquisition-driven growth has built global scale but at the cost of elevated goodwill and moderate leverage. The $1.2B annual FCF provides steady returns to shareholders. Capital discipline on future acquisitions will be key to maintaining returns.
Key Risks
Coatings manufacturers are exposed to raw material costs (resins, pigments, solvents). PPG's 41.3% gross margin reflects the industry's moderate ability to pass through costs. Periods of rapid input inflation can compress margins before pricing catches up.
PPG's industrial and automotive OEM segments are cyclically exposed. Construction activity, automotive production, and industrial output drive demand. A global recession would compress volumes across multiple segments simultaneously.
The 10-K states the 'coatings industry is highly competitive and consists of several large firms with global presence and many firms supplying local or regional markets.' Competition from Sherwin-Williams, Akzo Nobel, Nippon Paint, and regional players limits pricing power.
Key risks score 45/100 (moderate concern) — PPG faces manageable risks from raw material inflation, cyclical end-markets, and competitive intensity. None are existential, but the combination creates earnings volatility. The diversified segment structure provides partial mitigation.
Management
Ask about this section
Ask one question here. Keep digging when the issue needs more work.
This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.