THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY (SHW) 2025 10-K Earnings Analysis
THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY2025 Earnings Analysis
69/100
FY2024 → FY2025 Year-over-Year
vs prior annual reportIn FY2025, THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY's free cash flow grew 27.4% to $2.7B and operating cash flow grew 9.5% to $3.5B, while overall score dropped 11 to 69 and ROE fell 10.3pp to 55.9%.
Sherwin-Williams' FY2025 10-K reveals the premier coatings franchise: $23.6B revenue with 48.8% gross margin, $2.6B net income, and $3.5B OCF demonstrate pricing power that exceeds most industrial companies. The 55.9% ROE is boosted by aggressive buybacks ($4.6B equity on $25.9B assets), but the underlying business economics are genuinely superior — 4,853 company-operated Paint Stores create a captive distribution moat that competitors cannot easily replicate. FCF of $2.7B funds consistent shareholder returns. The 82.2% debt ratio and $8.0B goodwill (31.0% of assets) reflect the leveraged acquisition strategy (Valspar), but the durable demand for architectural paint and coatings supports the balance sheet.
Filing analysis
THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY 2025 10-K Analysis
This page reads THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY's 2025 10-K annual report through the EarningsMoat framework: earnings quality, economic moat strength, capital allocation, and key risks. The current overall score is 69/100, or grade D.
SHW Earnings Quality
The earnings-quality module scores 82/100, with Gross Margin: 48.8%, CF/Net Income: 1.34x. The core question is whether reported profit is backed by operating cash flow and recurring business economics. See the earnings quality analysis guide.
SHW Economic Moat Analysis
The moat-strength module scores 85/100, with Captive Distribution: 4,853 stores, Contractor Relationships: 88/100. The test is whether the advantage can protect returns after competitors react. Read the economic moat analysis guide.
SHW Free Cash Flow vs Net Income
CF/Net Income: 1.34x, Free Cash Flow: $2.7B is the fastest read on whether accounting earnings turn into cash. The capital-allocation module scores 75/100. For the diagnostic, start with cash flow vs net income.
SHW Key Risks from the Annual Report
The risk module scores 35/100, with Raw Material Costs: Medium, Housing/Construction Cycle: Low-Medium. The goal is to separate ordinary disclosure from risks that can change margins, cash flow, leverage, or the moat itself.
Is SHW a High Quality Earnings Stock?
Based on this 2025 filing, SHW needs a closer read before it qualifies as a high-quality earnings candidate: the overall grade is D, and the earnings-quality score is 82/100. This is a research screen, not investment advice.
Read the report first
Understand THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY first, then decide if it belongs on your watchlist
The SHW score, explanation, management facts, and filing sources are all here. When you want to follow more companies, review new-filing changes, or keep notes for the next review, keep more names in your watchlist.
Read the report first
Understand the company first. Keep up with every filing as your list grows.
A single report helps you judge one company. As your watchlist grows, review score, cash flow, moat, and risk changes together instead of repeating the same work.
Keep more names together
When your list grows, keep SHW with the rest of your names and review score, grade, and risk changes over time.
See how to track more namesAsk follow-up questions
Dig into cash conversion, moat evidence, capital allocation, and risk changes without rereading the full 10-K.
Ask a questionExport and revisit records
Save the SHW report as research notes you can revisit before the next filing.
Save research notesCore Dimension Scores
Evaluating competitive strength across earnings quality, moat strength, and risk sustainability
Overall Score Trend
Earnings Quality
Gross margin of 48.8% on $23.6B revenue is best-in-class for coatings, reflecting Sherwin-Williams' vertical integration (manufacturing + proprietary retail) and premium brand positioning. The Paint Stores Group sells exclusively Sherwin-Williams branded products, capturing the full margin stack from manufacturing to retail.
OCF of $3.5B against NI of $2.6B yields a 1.34x conversion ratio. The moderate spread reflects depreciation/amortization on the Valspar acquisition goodwill and PP&E. Earnings are solidly cash-backed.
ROE of 55.9% on $4.6B equity reflects both genuine business quality and financial leverage from aggressive buybacks. The 82.2% debt ratio amplifies returns but the underlying 10.9% net margin and 48.8% gross margin demonstrate the business merits high returns on any capital measure.
FCF of $2.7B ($3.5B OCF minus $798M capex) represents a 3.4% capex/revenue ratio. The Consumer Brands Group incurs most capex for manufacturing capacity and environmental compliance, while Paint Stores Group requires minimal capital for store operations.
Earnings quality scores 82/100 — Sherwin-Williams delivers best-in-class coatings economics: 48.8% gross margin, 55.9% ROE, 1.34x CF/NI, and $2.7B FCF. The vertically integrated model (manufacturing through retail) captures the full margin stack. The 31.0% goodwill from Valspar is the primary quality concern.
Moat Strength
The 10-K states Paint Stores Group consisted of '4,853 company-operated specialty paint stores in the United States, Canada and the Caribbean region.' This captive retail network is the widest moat in coatings — it provides direct contractor relationships, exclusive product access, and margin control that competitors selling through third-party retail cannot match.
Professional painting contractors — SHW's primary customer — develop deep loyalty to Sherwin-Williams stores where they get technical support, color matching, and reliable supply. Switching paint brands means relearning application properties, disrupting established color systems, and risking project quality.
The 48.8% gross margin at $23.6B scale — significantly higher than competitor PPG (41.3%) — demonstrates Sherwin-Williams' pricing power. The captive distribution model eliminates retailer margin pressure, and contractor switching costs support premium pricing across the portfolio.
Moat strength scores 85/100 — Sherwin-Williams possesses the widest moat in global coatings, anchored by 4,853 company-operated stores that create a captive distribution network. The contractor relationship flywheel, premium pricing (48.8% gross margin vs. PPG's 41.3%), and vertical integration create a self-reinforcing competitive advantage. The moat is stable to widening as new stores are added.
Capital Allocation
Capital expenditure of $798M on $23.6B revenue (3.4%) covers manufacturing capacity, store network expansion, and environmental compliance. The moderate capex intensity produces $2.7B FCF for shareholder returns.
Total debt ratio of 82.2% with $9.7B long-term debt reflects Valspar acquisition financing and aggressive share buybacks. While the 55.9% ROE benefits from leverage, the high debt ratio creates interest rate sensitivity and limits financial flexibility.
Sherwin-Williams has a long track record of dividend increases and share buybacks. The buyback program has been aggressive enough to drive equity from higher levels to $4.6B, creating the high-ROE, high-leverage capital structure. The $2.7B annual FCF comfortably funds all capital return programs.
Capital allocation scores 75/100 — the vertically integrated model with captive distribution generates exceptional returns (55.9% ROE), but the 82.2% debt ratio from the Valspar acquisition and buybacks creates balance sheet risk. The $2.7B FCF funds consistent shareholder returns while the debt gradually amortizes.
Key Risks
Coatings rely on TiO2, resins, and petroleum-derived solvents. Input cost inflation can compress margins before pricing adjustments catch up. However, SHW's 48.8% gross margin provides a significant cushion, and the captive store network enables faster price implementation than third-party retail channels.
Paint demand is tied to residential and commercial construction activity. However, approximately 80% of architectural paint demand is for repainting/maintenance rather than new construction, providing counter-cyclical resilience that many industrial companies lack.
The 82.2% debt ratio with $9.7B long-term debt creates refinancing risk and interest rate sensitivity. While the durable paint demand supports debt service capacity, the leverage leaves limited room for cyclical downturn or acquisition opportunity.
Key risks score 35/100 (lower = less concern) — Sherwin-Williams faces low-to-moderate risks. The ~80% repaint/maintenance demand mix provides exceptional counter-cyclical resilience. Raw material costs are manageable given the 48.8% gross margin cushion. The elevated leverage is the primary risk but is supported by durable cash generation.
Management
Ask about this section
Ask one question here. Keep digging when the issue needs more work.
This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.