NEWMONT CORPORATION (NEM) 2025 10-K Earnings Analysis
NEWMONT CORPORATION2025 Earnings Analysis
60/100
FY2024 → FY2025 Year-over-Year
vs prior annual reportIn FY2025, NEWMONT CORPORATION's free cash flow swung from $3.0B to $7.3B and net income swung from $3.3B to $7.1B, while overall score dropped 12 to 60.
NEM's FY2025 10-K reveals the world's largest gold miner riding an extraordinary gold price cycle: $22.7B revenue with $7.3B FCF, $7.1B net income, and 20.9% ROE on $33.9B equity. The moat is built on irreplaceable mine reserves, scale advantages in operations across multiple continents, and portfolio optimization through strategic asset sales. Pricing power is entirely dependent on the gold price — NEM is a leveraged bet on gold, not a pricing-power story. The moat is stable through reserve quality and operational scale, with the Newcrest acquisition transforming the company's geographic and reserve profile.
Filing analysis
NEWMONT CORPORATION 2025 10-K Analysis
This page reads NEWMONT CORPORATION's 2025 10-K annual report through the EarningsMoat framework: earnings quality, economic moat strength, capital allocation, and key risks. The current overall score is 60/100, or grade D.
NEM Earnings Quality
The earnings-quality module scores 72/100, with Net Income: $7.1B, CF/Net Income: 1.46x. The core question is whether reported profit is backed by operating cash flow and recurring business economics. See the earnings quality analysis guide.
NEM Economic Moat Analysis
The moat-strength module scores 62/100, with Reserve Quality/Scale: 85/100, Cost Position: 65/100. The test is whether the advantage can protect returns after competitors react. Read the economic moat analysis guide.
NEM Free Cash Flow vs Net Income
Net Income: $7.1B, CF/Net Income: 1.46x is the fastest read on whether accounting earnings turn into cash. The capital-allocation module scores 70/100. For the diagnostic, start with cash flow vs net income.
NEM Key Risks from the Annual Report
The risk module scores 35/100, with Gold Price Dependency: Critical, Geopolitical/Jurisdictional: Elevated. The goal is to separate ordinary disclosure from risks that can change margins, cash flow, leverage, or the moat itself.
Is NEM a High Quality Earnings Stock?
Based on this 2025 filing, NEM needs a closer read before it qualifies as a high-quality earnings candidate: the overall grade is D, and the earnings-quality score is 72/100. This is a research screen, not investment advice.
Read the report first
Understand NEWMONT CORPORATION first, then decide if it belongs on your watchlist
The NEM score, explanation, management facts, and filing sources are all here. When you want to follow more companies, review new-filing changes, or keep notes for the next review, keep more names in your watchlist.
Read the report first
Understand the company first. Keep up with every filing as your list grows.
A single report helps you judge one company. As your watchlist grows, review score, cash flow, moat, and risk changes together instead of repeating the same work.
Keep more names together
When your list grows, keep NEM with the rest of your names and review score, grade, and risk changes over time.
See how to track more namesAsk follow-up questions
Dig into cash conversion, moat evidence, capital allocation, and risk changes without rereading the full 10-K.
Ask a questionExport and revisit records
Save the NEM report as research notes you can revisit before the next filing.
Save research notesCore Dimension Scores
Evaluating competitive strength across earnings quality, moat strength, and risk sustainability
Overall Score Trend
Earnings Quality
Net income of $7.1B on $22.7B revenue represents a 31.2% net margin — strong, but entirely a function of elevated gold prices. In a lower gold price environment, margins compress dramatically as mining costs are relatively fixed. Earnings quality is hostage to commodity prices.
Operating cash flow of $10.3B against net income of $7.1B yields a 1.46x conversion ratio — strong cash generation exceeding reported earnings, driven by depreciation, depletion, and amortization addbacks from the massive mining asset base.
Free cash flow of $7.3B ($10.3B OCF less $3.0B capex) represents a 32.2% FCF margin — extraordinary but gold-price-dependent. The $3.0B capex funds mine development, sustaining capital, and exploration to replenish depleting reserves.
Gold mining earnings are directly tied to the gold price, which has been at record highs during FY2025. Current profitability is not sustainable at materially lower gold prices. NEM's $7.1B net income could decline by 50%+ if gold prices revert to 2020-2022 levels.
Earnings quality scores 72/100 — strong cash generation in the current gold price environment, but quality is inherently cyclical. The 1.46x CF/NI and $7.3B FCF demonstrate real cash conversion, and the 20.9% ROE reflects genuine value creation at current gold prices. However, the entire earnings profile is gold-price-dependent — NEM has no pricing power, it has gold price leverage.
Moat Strength
NEM is the world's largest gold miner with operations across multiple continents. The Newcrest acquisition added Tier 1 assets in Australia, Canada, and Papua New Guinea. Proven and probable reserves, measured/indicated/inferred resources, and operating mines in stable jurisdictions create a scale advantage that no other gold miner can match.
NEM reports All-In Sustaining Costs (AISC) as a key metric. Scale operations can achieve lower per-ounce costs, but gold mining is inherently high-cost with inflation in labor, energy, and equipment. The company's portfolio optimization (divesting high-cost assets) improves the cost profile of remaining operations.
NEM has zero pricing power — gold is sold at the LBMA spot price. The company is a pure price-taker on its primary product. The moat is in cost efficiency and reserve quality, not in the ability to set prices. Revenue is entirely a function of gold ounces produced multiplied by the prevailing gold price.
Moat strength scores 62/100 — a cost-and-reserve moat without pricing power. NEM's competitive advantage lies in having the largest, most diversified portfolio of gold reserves globally, with scale that enables lower costs per ounce. But this is a moat within a commodity — it determines relative performance versus other gold miners, not absolute performance which is entirely gold-price-dependent.
Capital Allocation
NEM is actively optimizing its portfolio post-Newcrest, divesting non-core and high-cost assets to focus on Tier 1 operations. This discipline — selling mines at attractive prices in a high gold price environment — demonstrates shareholder-oriented capital allocation.
Total debt ratio of 40.7% with $5.1B long-term debt is conservative for a capital-intensive mining company. Debt-to-FCF of just 0.7x means NEM could retire all debt within one year of current free cash flow. The strong balance sheet provides resilience through gold price downturns.
Capital expenditure of $3.0B on $22.7B revenue (13.4%) is moderate for mining but reflects the capital-intensive nature of maintaining and developing mineral reserves. This includes sustaining capital, mine development, and exploration to replenish depleting reserves.
Capital allocation scores 70/100 — disciplined portfolio management and conservative balance sheet, appropriate for a cyclical commodity business. NEM's 40.7% debt ratio provides significant financial resilience through commodity cycles, and the active divestiture program optimizes the portfolio toward highest-return assets. The $7.3B FCF funds capex, dividends, buybacks, and debt reduction simultaneously.
Key Risks
NEM's entire earnings profile is leveraged to the gold price. A 20% decline in gold prices from record levels would compress net income by 40%+ given the fixed cost structure of mining operations. There is no way to hedge or mitigate this fundamental business risk — NEM exists as a gold price proxy.
NEM operates mines in multiple countries including Peru, Papua New Guinea, Ghana, Argentina, and others per the 10-K. Political instability, resource nationalism, permitting delays, and government tax/royalty changes in mining jurisdictions create ongoing operational risk.
Mining operations face extensive environmental regulation, tailings dam liability (GISTM compliance), water treatment requirements, and GHG emission reduction mandates. Environmental incidents at any operation could result in mine suspensions, fines, and reputational damage.
Key risks score 35/100 — gold price dependency is the overwhelming risk, rendering all other risks secondary. NEM is fundamentally a leveraged bet on gold prices. The current $7.3B FCF and $7.1B net income reflect record gold prices that may not persist. Geopolitical risk across mining jurisdictions and environmental liabilities add incremental risk to the commodity price core risk.
Management
Ask about this section
Ask one question here. Keep digging when the issue needs more work.
This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.