PROCTER & GAMBLE CO (PG) 2025 10-K Earnings Analysis
PROCTER & GAMBLE CO2025 Earnings Analysis
74/100
FY2024 → FY2025 Year-over-Year
vs prior annual reportIn FY2025, PROCTER & GAMBLE CO's net income grew 7.4% to $16.0B and ROE rose 1.1pp to 30.6%, while overall score dropped 9 to 74 and free cash flow declined 15% to $14.0B.
Procter & Gamble's FY2025 10-K reveals the quintessential consumer staples moat: $84.3B revenue with 51.2% gross margin, $16.0B net income (19.0% net margin), and $17.8B OCF demonstrate pricing power that few companies can match. The 1.11x CF/NI ratio confirms earnings purity. P&G's moat is holding — daily-use product categories with #1 or #2 market positions, 'irresistible superiority' strategy across 5 vectors, and Walmart at 16% of sales (no other customer >10%) provide diversified, recession-resistant cash flows. The only notable concern is the technically negative equity driven by aggressive buybacks, making ROE mathematically undefined.
Filing analysis
PROCTER & GAMBLE CO 2025 10-K Analysis
This page reads PROCTER & GAMBLE CO's 2025 10-K annual report through the EarningsMoat framework: earnings quality, economic moat strength, capital allocation, and key risks. The current overall score is 74/100, or grade C.
PG Earnings Quality
The earnings-quality module scores 90/100, with Gross Margin: 51.2%, CF/Net Income: 1.11x. The core question is whether reported profit is backed by operating cash flow and recurring business economics. See the earnings quality analysis guide.
PG Economic Moat Analysis
The moat-strength module scores 88/100, with Brand Portfolio: 92/100, Pricing Power: 88/100. The test is whether the advantage can protect returns after competitors react. Read the economic moat analysis guide.
PG Free Cash Flow vs Net Income
CF/Net Income: 1.11x, Free Cash Flow: $14.0B is the fastest read on whether accounting earnings turn into cash. The capital-allocation module scores 88/100. For the diagnostic, start with cash flow vs net income.
PG Key Risks from the Annual Report
The risk module scores 30/100, with Input Cost Inflation: Medium, Private Label Competition: Low-Medium. The goal is to separate ordinary disclosure from risks that can change margins, cash flow, leverage, or the moat itself.
Is PG a High Quality Earnings Stock?
Based on this 2025 filing, PG needs a closer read before it qualifies as a high-quality earnings candidate: the overall grade is C, and the earnings-quality score is 90/100. This is a research screen, not investment advice.
Read the report first
Understand PROCTER & GAMBLE CO first, then decide if it belongs on your watchlist
The PG score, explanation, management facts, and filing sources are all here. When you want to follow more companies, review new-filing changes, or keep notes for the next review, keep more names in your watchlist.
Read the report first
Understand the company first. Keep up with every filing as your list grows.
A single report helps you judge one company. As your watchlist grows, review score, cash flow, moat, and risk changes together instead of repeating the same work.
Keep more names together
When your list grows, keep PG with the rest of your names and review score, grade, and risk changes over time.
See how to track more namesAsk follow-up questions
Dig into cash conversion, moat evidence, capital allocation, and risk changes without rereading the full 10-K.
Ask a questionExport and revisit records
Save the PG report as research notes you can revisit before the next filing.
Save research notesCore Dimension Scores
Evaluating competitive strength across earnings quality, moat strength, and risk sustainability
Overall Score Trend
Earnings Quality
Gross margin of 51.2% on $84.3B revenue is exceptional for consumer staples, reflecting P&G's premium brand positioning and pricing power. The 10-K describes the strategy as 'irresistible superiority across five key vectors — product performance, packaging, brand communication, retail execution and value,' which enables sustained premium pricing.
OCF of $17.8B against NI of $16.0B yields a near-perfect 1.11x conversion ratio. This tight alignment between cash and accrual earnings is the hallmark of high-quality consumer staples earnings — predictable, recurring, and cash-backed.
Net income of $16.0B on $84.3B revenue yields a 19.0% net margin — elite-tier for consumer staples. This margin reflects not just pricing power but also productivity improvements that the 10-K describes as essential to funding 'investments in research and development and marketing.'
FCF of $14.0B ($17.8B OCF minus $3.8B capex) represents a 4.5% capex/revenue ratio. The $14B annual FCF funds P&G's consistent dividend increases and share buybacks. This FCF yield on revenue (16.7%) is among the highest in consumer staples globally.
Earnings quality scores 90/100 — P&G delivers textbook-quality earnings: 51.2% gross margin, 19.0% net margin, 1.11x CF/NI, and $14.0B FCF. Every dollar of reported profit is backed by cash. The predictability of daily-use consumer staples demand combined with #1/#2 market positions creates earnings durability that very few companies can match.
Moat Strength
P&G operates a diversified portfolio of daily-use brands across Beauty, Grooming, Health Care, Fabric & Home Care, and Baby, Feminine & Family Care. Products sold in about 180 countries. Top 10 customers represent 43% of sales in FY2025, with Walmart at 16% — providing diversified demand without excessive concentration.
The 51.2% gross margin on $84.3B revenue at scale demonstrates sustained pricing power. The 10-K's 'irresistible superiority' strategy explicitly targets premium positioning. P&G has successfully passed through commodity cost inflation to consumers across multiple pricing cycles, confirming brand pricing resilience.
The 10-K lists mass merchandisers, e-commerce, grocery stores, membership clubs, drug stores, and direct-to-consumer as distribution channels. The breadth of channel access — combined with #1/#2 category positions — creates shelf-space advantages that are extremely difficult for competitors to replicate.
Moat strength scores 88/100 — P&G's moat is among the widest in consumer staples. The combination of daily-use necessity, global brand recognition, multi-channel distribution, and demonstrated pricing power (51.2% gross margins at $84B scale) creates a compounding franchise. The moat is stable-to-widening as productivity gains fund continued brand investment.
Capital Allocation
Capital expenditure of $3.8B on $84.3B revenue (4.5%) is moderate and focused on manufacturing capacity and operational efficiency. The resulting $14.0B FCF demonstrates the capital-efficient nature of consumer staples businesses.
P&G is a Dividend Aristocrat with decades of consecutive dividend increases. The aggressive share buyback program has driven equity to zero (technically negative), meaning all $14.0B FCF effectively flows to shareholders through dividends and repurchases. The buyback program is so aggressive it has eliminated positive book equity.
Goodwill of $41.7B represents 33.3% of $125.2B total assets — primarily from historical acquisitions (Gillette, etc.). While high in percentage terms, these are seasoned brands with proven earnings power. The risk is in potential impairment if brand value deteriorates, though P&G's brand portfolio has proven remarkably durable.
Capital allocation scores 88/100 — P&G is a capital return machine. The $14.0B FCF funds decades of consecutive dividend increases and buybacks so aggressive they've eliminated positive book equity. The 4.5% capex intensity maintains operations while returning maximum cash to shareholders. Goodwill is elevated but represents proven legacy brands.
Key Risks
The 10-K notes 'almost all of the raw and packaging materials used by the Company are purchased from third parties.' Commodity cost inflation (resins, palm oil, pulp) can compress margins, though P&G has demonstrated ability to pass through costs via pricing increases.
Private label/store brand growth in mass retail and e-commerce could pressure market share in price-sensitive categories. However, P&G's premium positioning and 'irresistible superiority' strategy is specifically designed to create enough perceived value to justify price premiums over private label alternatives.
With products sold in about 180 countries, P&G faces significant currency translation risk. A strong U.S. dollar reduces reported revenue and earnings from international operations, though the geographic diversification also provides natural hedging benefits.
Key risks score 30/100 (lower = less concern) — P&G faces manageable risks typical of consumer staples: input cost inflation, private label competition, and currency headwinds. None of these threatens the fundamental business model. The 51.2% gross margin provides a substantial cushion to absorb cost pressures while maintaining profitability.
Management
Ask about this section
Ask one question here. Keep digging when the issue needs more work.
This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.