The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) 2024 10-K Earnings Analysis
The Procter & Gamble Company2024 Earnings Analysis
83/100
P&G's FY2024 10-K (fiscal year ended June 30, 2024) shows the prototypical brand-moat consumer-staples giant: revenue of $84.0B (roughly flat) produced $14.9B net income at 17.7% net margin, with $16.5B FCF. The 51.4% gross margin and 29.4% ROE are consistent with the brand-driven pricing power across 10 product categories — Fabric Care (Tide), Baby Care (Pampers), Feminine Care (Always), Grooming (Gillette), Oral Care (Crest), Personal Health, Hair Care (Head & Shoulders), Home Care (Swiffer/Mr. Clean), Skin Care (Olay), and Beauty. The 10-K describes the strategy as 'delivering sustainable value creation by driving balanced top- and bottom-line growth' through five vectors — product performance, packaging, brand communication, retail execution, and value. Goodwill at 33% of assets reflects the legacy acquisitions (Gillette, Wella) but no impairment concerns at current earnings power.
Filing analysis
The Procter & Gamble Company 2024 10-K Analysis
This page reads The Procter & Gamble Company's 2024 10-K annual report through the EarningsMoat framework: earnings quality, economic moat strength, capital allocation, and key risks. The current overall score is 83/100, or grade B.
PG Earnings Quality
The earnings-quality module scores 86/100, with Gross Margin: 51.4%, CF/Net Income: 1.33x. The core question is whether reported profit is backed by operating cash flow and recurring business economics. See the earnings quality analysis guide.
PG Economic Moat Analysis
The moat-strength module scores 92/100, with Brand Portfolio Breadth: 10 categories, Five-Vector Strategy: Operational moat. The test is whether the advantage can protect returns after competitors react. Read the economic moat analysis guide.
PG Free Cash Flow vs Net Income
CF/Net Income: 1.33x is the fastest read on whether accounting earnings turn into cash. The capital-allocation module scores 82/100. For the diagnostic, start with cash flow vs net income.
PG Key Risks from the Annual Report
The risk module scores 72/100, with Private Label + DTC Insurgents: Slow erosion, Emerging Markets Volatility: FX + local brands. The goal is to separate ordinary disclosure from risks that can change margins, cash flow, leverage, or the moat itself.
Is PG a High Quality Earnings Stock?
Based on this 2024 filing, PG passes the first screen for high-quality earnings: the overall grade is B, and the earnings-quality score is 86/100. This is a research screen, not investment advice.
Read the report first
Understand The Procter & Gamble Company first, then decide if it belongs on your watchlist
The PG score, explanation, management facts, and filing sources are all here. When you want to follow more companies, review new-filing changes, or keep notes for the next review, keep more names in your watchlist.
Read the report first
Understand the company first. Keep up with every filing as your list grows.
A single report helps you judge one company. As your watchlist grows, review score, cash flow, moat, and risk changes together instead of repeating the same work.
Keep more names together
When your list grows, keep PG with the rest of your names and review score, grade, and risk changes over time.
See how to track more namesAsk follow-up questions
Dig into cash conversion, moat evidence, capital allocation, and risk changes without rereading the full 10-K.
Ask a questionExport and revisit records
Save the PG report as research notes you can revisit before the next filing.
Save research notesCore Dimension Scores
Evaluating competitive strength across earnings quality, moat strength, and risk sustainability
Overall Score Trend
Earnings Quality
51.4% gross margin — exceptional for consumer staples, reflecting the brand-based pricing power. P&G's portfolio leans premium (Pampers, Gillette, Olay, Tide) vs value-tier peers. Pricing power absorbs input cost inflation (commodity chemicals, plastic) consistently through cycles.
OCF of $19.8B against NI of $14.9B = 1.33x — clean conversion with non-cash D&A on manufacturing + brand intangibles boosting cash. Consistently above 1.2x in recent years.
Revenue of $84.0B was roughly flat vs FY2023's $82.0B. Organic sales growth was positive (low-single-digits) but offset by FX headwinds. Multi-year comparison: pricing-led growth +8% / year 2021-2023 tapering to +3% in FY2024 as post-inflation consumer pushback emerged.
Operating margin near 24% is at the high end of P&G's historical range, reflecting pricing-power benefits + cost-productivity programs. SG&A discipline + manufacturing productivity have compounded through multiple management generations.
Earnings quality scores 86/100. 51.4% GM + 1.33x CF/NI + 17.7% NI margin put P&G in elite consumer-staples company. Revenue-growth has decelerated as the pricing cycle matured; the recurring revenue base + brand power keeps earnings stable through macroeconomic turns. No accrual-to-cash gaps, no unusual one-time items.
Moat Strength
P&G operates 10 product segments, each with category-leading brands: Tide (Fabric Care), Pampers (Baby), Gillette (Grooming), Crest (Oral), Olay (Skin), Head & Shoulders (Hair), Always (Feminine), Swiffer (Home), Pantene/Herbal Essences. Category concentration of a leader-brand in each grants massive retailer shelf negotiation power.
The 10-K describes 'irresistible superiority across five key vectors - product performance, packaging, brand communication, retail execution and value.' This operational discipline compounds over decades — each product iteration advances product + packaging + shelf presentation + pricing simultaneously.
P&G raised prices mid-to-high single digits through 2022-2024 commodity inflation while maintaining or growing volumes. This is the textbook signal of brand moat — consumers accept price increases because there's no viable substitute perceived at the quality + trust level.
P&G has the scale to be Walmart/Target/Costco's biggest CPG supplier — retailer partnerships yield preferential shelf space + category-captaincy arrangements. Smaller CPG competitors cannot match P&G's trade investment budgets or retailer analytics integration.
Moat strength scores 92/100. Brand portfolio + category-leadership + operational discipline + retail scale combine into one of the widest consumer moats globally. The five-vector operating model is the underappreciated moat — not a product advantage but a continuous-improvement system across 10 categories simultaneously. Private label and DTC insurgents (Harry's, Dollar Shave) have taken marginal share over a decade but P&G's core franchises remain dominant.
Capital Allocation
FCF of $16.5B = 19.6% FCF margin. CapEx runs ~$3.3B supporting manufacturing capacity upgrades + digital transformation. Consistent FCF generation funds both shareholder returns and ongoing productivity investments.
ROE of 29.4% (NI $14.9B / Equity $50.6B) — strong without the extreme leverage seen in buyback-heavy peers. Debt ratio of 59% is moderate. This is quality-of-return discipline, not engineered yield.
P&G has paid dividends for 134+ consecutive years and raised them for 68+ consecutive years — among the longest streaks on record. Annual payout ~$9.3B is 1.8x-covered by $16.5B FCF. This is the canonical dividend-aristocrat position.
Annual buybacks run $5-7B typically. Share count shrinks ~1-2% per year, modestly accelerating EPS growth above net income growth. Conservative relative to MCD/HD's negative-equity-territory pace.
Capital allocation scores 82/100. 68 consecutive years of dividend raises is the canonical dividend-aristocrat position. ROE at 29.4% is real return discipline, not engineered leverage. Buybacks + dividends are comfortably covered by FCF, leaving room for bolt-on M&A and productivity investments. Conservative vs peers — reflects P&G's multi-decade owner-operator culture (institutional rather than family-owned but similar stewardship).
Key Risks
Dollar Shave Club, Harry's, Native, and retailer private labels have captured marginal share from P&G categories over a decade. The erosion is slow but continuous; it pressures the 51% gross margin over long time horizons.
Greater China and Russia represent material headwinds in recent years (China weakness, Russia withdrawal). Local competitors in China grocery + home care (e.g., Yili, Vinda) have gained share. FX volatility amplifies reported revenue swings.
Oil, palm, pulp, packaging materials — all commodity inputs where price spikes compress margin until pricing can be passed through. P&G has the pricing power but lag-effect creates quarters of margin pressure during commodity inflation episodes.
In developed markets, category penetration for laundry detergent, shampoo, deodorant etc. is saturated. Growth comes from premiumization or M&A. Emerging-market expansion is the natural outlet but carries execution + currency risks.
Risk profile scores 72/100 (higher = safer). None of P&G's risks are acute; all are slow-moving secular pressures. Private label + DTC insurgency, emerging-market volatility, commodity cycles, and developed-market saturation are the four chronic headwinds that consumer staples navigate. The brand moat absorbs each individually; the compound effect caps revenue growth in low-single digits.
Management
Ask about this section
Ask one question here. Keep digging when the issue needs more work.
This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.