Synopsys, Inc. (SNPS) 2024 10-K Earnings Analysis
Synopsys, Inc.2024 Earnings Analysis
83/100
Synopsys, Inc.'s FY2024 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2024 is easiest to read through $6.13B of revenue, $2.26B of net income, and $1.27B of free cash flow. Synopsys.ai Suite, EDA Duopoly, and Design IP Library remain the clearest way to understand where the economics come from and why margin durability looks different here than it would at a generic peer. Gross margin was 79.7% and operating margin was 22.1%, so FY2024 does not look like a year bought with weak pricing or loose cost control. The next test is whether management can hold onto today's economics as the business mix and end markets move around it.
Filing analysis
Synopsys, Inc. 2024 10-K Analysis
This page reads Synopsys, Inc.'s 2024 10-K annual report through the EarningsMoat framework: earnings quality, economic moat strength, capital allocation, and key risks. The current overall score is 83/100, or grade B.
SNPS Earnings Quality
The earnings-quality module scores 88/100, with Gross Margin: 79.7%, Operating Margin: 22.1%. The core question is whether reported profit is backed by operating cash flow and recurring business economics. See the earnings quality analysis guide.
SNPS Economic Moat Analysis
The moat-strength module scores 92/100, with EDA Duopoly: With Cadence, Design IP Library: DesignWare. The test is whether the advantage can protect returns after competitors react. Read the economic moat analysis guide.
SNPS Free Cash Flow vs Net Income
CF/Net Income: 0.62x is the fastest read on whether accounting earnings turn into cash. The capital-allocation module scores 78/100. For the diagnostic, start with cash flow vs net income.
SNPS Key Risks from the Annual Report
The risk module scores 74/100, with Ansys Closing: Regulatory, Semiconductor Design Cycle: Tied to chip design starts. The goal is to separate ordinary disclosure from risks that can change margins, cash flow, leverage, or the moat itself.
Is SNPS a High Quality Earnings Stock?
Based on this 2024 filing, SNPS passes the first screen for high-quality earnings: the overall grade is B, and the earnings-quality score is 88/100. This is a research screen, not investment advice.
Read the report first
Understand Synopsys, Inc. first, then decide if it belongs on your watchlist
The SNPS score, explanation, management facts, and filing sources are all here. When you want to follow more companies, review new-filing changes, or keep notes for the next review, keep more names in your watchlist.
Read the report first
Understand the company first. Keep up with every filing as your list grows.
A single report helps you judge one company. As your watchlist grows, review score, cash flow, moat, and risk changes together instead of repeating the same work.
Keep more names together
When your list grows, keep SNPS with the rest of your names and review score, grade, and risk changes over time.
See how to track more namesAsk follow-up questions
Dig into cash conversion, moat evidence, capital allocation, and risk changes without rereading the full 10-K.
Ask a questionExport and revisit records
Save the SNPS report as research notes you can revisit before the next filing.
Save research notesCore Dimension Scores
Evaluating competitive strength across earnings quality, moat strength, and risk sustainability
Overall Score Trend
Earnings Quality
Per the fiscal 2024 10-K income statement, gross margin of 79.7% reflects the EDA software and IP licensing economics — both subscription and time based license models with limited cost of revenue per unit sold per the revenue-recognition footnote.
Per the fiscal 2024 10-K income statement, operating margin of 22.1% reflects the R&D-heavy operating model — Synopsys has historically invested a meaningful share of revenue in R&D as described in the expense breakdown.
Per the fiscal 2024 cash flow statement, OCF of $1.4B is 0.62x net income of $2.26B. The ratio below 1x reflects FY2024-specific items including the Software Integrity divestiture-related cash impact disclosed in the divestitures footnote (Synopsys sold Software Integrity to Clearlake Capital and Francisco Partners in September 2024 per the closing announcement).
Per Synopsys' September 2024 closing press release, the Software Integrity Group was divested to Clearlake Capital and Francisco Partners — narrowing focus to core EDA + IP businesses ahead of the Ansys close. The divestiture cash and gain are disclosed in the discontinued-operations footnote.
FY2024 10-K shows $2.26B of net income on $6.13B of revenue, but the cleaner read is the $1.41B of operating cash flow that turned into $1.27B of free cash flow. Synopsys.ai Suite and EDA Duopoly help explain why the margin profile stayed where it did instead of collapsing with every demand wobble. Operating margin landed at 22.1%, while capex ran at 2.3% of revenue. Cash conversion is the part of the file to keep watching, because the accounting result is stronger than the cash result right now.
Moat Strength
Per the fiscal 2024 10-K business description and industry trade-press coverage, the high-end EDA (electronic design automation) market for chip design is structured around Synopsys and Cadence — with Mentor Graphics (now Siemens EDA per the 2017 acquisition) as the third major player. Multi-decade tool-flow customer engagement creates structural switching costs.
Per the fiscal 2024 Design IP segment disclosures, Synopsys' DesignWare IP portfolio includes interface IP (USB, PCIe, DDR, Ethernet, HDMI), processor IP (ARC, ARM Architecture based per partnership announcements), and security IP. IP-licensing revenue grows with chip-design starts per industry-analyst coverage.
Per the fiscal 2024 MD&A and successive product-launch press releases, Synopsys.ai (the AI-driven EDA suite covering DSO.ai for design space optimization, VSO.ai for verification, TSO.ai for test) is the publicly described differentiator versus traditional EDA flows. Customer-adoption cadence is disclosed in supplemental investor communications.
Goodwill of $3.4B on $13B assets equals 26.4% per the fiscal 2024 balance sheet — reflecting historical M&A including Coverity, Black Duck (now divested with Software Integrity), Avitek, and other targeted bolt-ons per past M&A press releases. Pre-Ansys close, this is the baseline goodwill level.
The competitive position starts with Synopsys.ai Suite and EDA Duopoly, not with a vague appeal to scale. Design IP Library and AI-EDA Tools matter because they deepen switching friction, expand installed-base economics, or widen route to market reach. FY2024 ROE was 25.2%, but the more important check is that cash generation and margins still support the operating story. That does not make the business immune; it means the next competitor has to overcome a functioning operating system rather than just a familiar name.
Capital Allocation
Per the fiscal 2024 cash flow statement, FCF of $1.3B (OCF $1.4B minus capex $0.14B) reflects FY2024-specific items but the core EDA and IP business cash generation remains the underlying long-run cash signal.
Per Synopsys' January 2024 Ansys merger-agreement press release, the cash and stock transaction values Ansys at approximately $35B and is conditional on regulatory approvals. Closing per subsequent investor communications is expected within the disclosed timeline. The transaction reshapes the post-close capital structure.
Per the fiscal 2024 balance sheet, Synopsys held $3.9B cash at fiscal year end — providing the capital base for the Ansys-deal cash component disclosed in the merger-agreement press release.
Per the fiscal 2024 capital-return disclosures, Synopsys does not pay a regular dividend; share repurchases were paused ahead of the Ansys deal close as described in the capital-allocation framework, redirecting cash toward the merger consideration.
$1.27B of free cash flow is the starting point for the capital-allocation discussion, because it defines how much room management actually had after funding the business. Capex intensity is light at 2.3% of revenue, so the real allocation decision is what management does with the cash left after maintaining the platform. $3.90B of cash versus $15.6M of debt keeps the balance sheet flexible even after capital returns and reinvestment. The capital-return file is split between the dividend and share repurchases, with room for both as long as cash generation stays near the current level.
Key Risks
Per Synopsys' January 2024 announcement of the Ansys merger and subsequent investor communications, the deal is subject to regulatory approvals across multiple jurisdictions including the EU and China. The European Commission has launched an in-depth review per its public DG-COMP communications.
Per the fiscal 2024 Risk Factors, Synopsys revenue tracks semiconductor-customer R&D spending and chip design start activity. Macro-cycle compression in the semiconductor industry can reduce IP licensing deal volume and EDA-tool spending.
Per the fiscal 2024 Risk Factors and BIS public communications, US export controls on advanced semiconductor design tools have evolved in successive rule rounds. Per SEC and company filings, china-customer access to the most-advanced EDA capabilities is a disclosed regulatory variable affecting the China-business trajectory.
Per the fiscal 2024 customer-concentration disclosures, EDA-tool revenue concentrates on the major fabless customers, IDMs, and foundries (TSMC, Samsung, Intel, NVIDIA, AMD, Qualcomm per industry-analyst coverage of EDA-tool customer relationships). Customer-relationship dynamics affect long-term tool-flow attachment.
The risk section is better read as a set of operating tradeoffs than as one binary red flag. Pressure in one part of the model can travel into margins and cash conversion faster than the headline score suggests. Goodwill is 26.4% of assets, so portfolio execution and acquisition discipline remain part of the risk discussion. The next test is whether management can hold onto today's economics as the business mix and end markets move around it.
Management
Ask about this section
Ask one question here. Keep digging when the issue needs more work.
This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.
