Apple Inc. (AAPL) 2024 10-K Earnings Analysis
Apple Inc.2024 Earnings Analysis
82/100
Apple's FY2024 10-K shows a company pivoting its growth engine from hardware to Services, which reached $96.2B (+13%) at 73.9% gross margin — up from 70.8% in FY2023. Greater China revenue declined 8% to $67.0B as local competition intensified, and a one-time $10.2B State Aid Decision tax charge pushed the effective tax rate from 14.7% to 24.1%. The 164.4% ROE is mathematically dazzling but financed by 84% leverage — aggressive capital return on a thin equity base.
Filing analysis
Apple Inc. 2024 10-K Analysis
This page reads Apple Inc.'s 2024 10-K annual report through the EarningsMoat framework: earnings quality, economic moat strength, capital allocation, and key risks. The current overall score is 82/100, or grade B.
AAPL Earnings Quality
The earnings-quality module scores 86/100, with Gross Margin: 46.2%, CF/Net Income: 1.26x. The core question is whether reported profit is backed by operating cash flow and recurring business economics. See the earnings quality analysis guide.
AAPL Economic Moat Analysis
The moat-strength module scores 93/100, with Services Ecosystem: Exceptional, Gross Margin Trend: 43.3% → 44.1% → 46.2%. The test is whether the advantage can protect returns after competitors react. Read the economic moat analysis guide.
AAPL Free Cash Flow vs Net Income
CF/Net Income: 1.26x is the fastest read on whether accounting earnings turn into cash. The capital-allocation module scores 82/100. For the diagnostic, start with cash flow vs net income.
AAPL Key Risks from the Annual Report
The risk module scores 66/100, with Greater China Decline: -8% YoY, Wearables Contraction: -7% YoY. The goal is to separate ordinary disclosure from risks that can change margins, cash flow, leverage, or the moat itself.
Is AAPL a High Quality Earnings Stock?
Based on this 2024 filing, AAPL passes the first screen for high-quality earnings: the overall grade is B, and the earnings-quality score is 86/100. This is a research screen, not investment advice.
Read the report first
Understand Apple Inc. first, then decide if it belongs on your watchlist
The AAPL score, explanation, management facts, and filing sources are all here. When you want to follow more companies, review new-filing changes, or keep notes for the next review, keep more names in your watchlist.
Read the report first
Understand the company first. Keep up with every filing as your list grows.
A single report helps you judge one company. As your watchlist grows, review score, cash flow, moat, and risk changes together instead of repeating the same work.
Keep more names together
When your list grows, keep AAPL with the rest of your names and review score, grade, and risk changes over time.
See how to track more namesAsk follow-up questions
Dig into cash conversion, moat evidence, capital allocation, and risk changes without rereading the full 10-K.
Ask a questionExport and revisit records
Save the AAPL report as research notes you can revisit before the next filing.
Save research notesCore Dimension Scores
Evaluating competitive strength across earnings quality, moat strength, and risk sustainability
Overall Score Trend
Earnings Quality
Total gross margin expanded from 44.1% (FY2023) to 46.2% (FY2024) — the 10-K attributes this to 'cost savings, partially offset by a different Products mix and the weakness in foreign currencies.' Services gross margin of 73.9% (up from 70.8%) is the structural driver; Products margin improved to 37.2% from 36.5%.
Operating cash flow of $118.3B against net income of $93.7B yields a 1.26x conversion ratio — well above the 1.0x threshold for high-quality earnings. The State Aid Decision created a $10.2B accrued tax charge that suppressed reported NI without corresponding cash outflow, explaining the elevated ratio.
Services gross margin hit 73.9%, up from 70.8% in FY2023 — the 10-K attributes this to 'a different Services mix.' Services revenue compounded to $96.2B (+13%) with $71.1B of gross profit; this near-software-level margin on a $96B base is the single most important quality metric in Apple's earnings.
Total net sales grew 2% to $391.0B from $383.3B. The 10-K shows iPhone revenue relatively flat at $201.2B, Mac up 2% to $30.0B, and Services surging 13% to $96.2B. iPad fell 6%; Wearables/Home/Accessories fell 7%. Growth now hinges almost entirely on Services.
Earnings quality scores 86/100 — high conversion (1.26x CF/NI) and expanding blended gross margin driven by Services. The 10-K reveals the story clearly: Services revenue compounded to $96.2B at 73.9% gross margin while Products grew only modestly, confirming the business is tilting toward a software-like profile. The State Aid Decision's $10.2B one-time charge distorts reported earnings downward; underlying quality is stronger than the headline NI suggests. The yellow flag is top-line deceleration: 2% total growth is weak for a company priced as a compounder, and the filing acknowledges 'the weakness in the renminbi relative to the U.S. dollar had an unfavorable year-over-year impact on Greater China net sales.'
Moat Strength
Services revenue of $96.2B at 73.9% gross margin — compounding at roughly 11% annually over two years (FY2022 $78.1B → FY2023 $85.2B → FY2024 $96.2B) — demonstrates the monetization power of the installed base. The 10-K attributes growth to 'higher net sales from advertising, the App Store and cloud services' — three distinct high-margin annuity streams tied to the ecosystem lock-in.
Three consecutive years of gross margin expansion (43.3% → 44.1% → 46.2%) demonstrate pricing power. The 10-K documents that Products margin rose to 37.2% 'due to cost savings, partially offset by a different Products mix and the weakness in foreign currencies' — maintaining expansion even as FX was a headwind.
iPhone revenue of $201.2B — over half of total sales — stayed flat despite macro headwinds, with Mac up 2% on 'higher net sales of laptops.' The 10-K notes Japan net sales rose 3% and Rest of Asia Pacific rose 4%; this geographic breadth of premium demand signals durable brand elasticity.
$9.4B capex on $391.0B revenue = 2.4% capital intensity — remarkably low for a $400B hardware company. The fabless manufacturing model (the 10-K: 'substantially all of the Company's manufacturing is performed in whole or in part by outsourcing partners located primarily in China mainland, India, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam') converts almost the entire OCF into FCF.
Moat strength scores 93/100. Two reinforcing mechanisms show up in the FY2024 10-K: (1) an installed-base monetization layer — App Store, iCloud, Apple Music, Apple TV+, Apple Care, Apple Pay, advertising — that collectively runs at a 73.9% Services gross margin (up 3pp YoY), and (2) pricing power across iPhone, Mac, iPad, Vision Pro, and Apple Watch durable enough to absorb FX and component-cost pressures while still expanding overall gross margin by 2.1pp. The outsourced manufacturing model (the 10-K lists China mainland, India, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and Vietnam as the primary locations for partners including Foxconn and Pegatron) keeps CapEx at 2.4% of revenue, which multiplies operating leverage. The visible weak spot is geographic: Greater China's 8% decline ($72.6B → $67.0B) reflects domestic-brand competition (Huawei's Mate and Pura lines reportedly regaining share per trade press) that the ecosystem moat has not offset.
Capital Allocation
Free cash flow of $108.9B = 27.8% FCF margin on $391B revenue — nearly $110B in annual distributable cash. The OCF-to-FCF gap is just $9.4B (capex), confirming the asset-light model at scale. Apple is among the world's top 3 FCF generators.
The reported 164.4% ROE is an artifact of capital structure rather than an operating signal: Apple carries $308B of liabilities against $57B of equity per the FY2024 10-K balance sheet. Management has used low-cost debt to fund share repurchases over many years rather than repatriating overseas cash at higher tax rates, which mechanically shrinks the equity denominator. ROA — a cleaner view of operating productivity — is 25.7% ($93.7B NI on $365B assets).
Apple carries $0 goodwill on a $365B balance sheet — a structural advantage reflecting decades of internal growth over acquisition. This means zero M&A-related amortization, no impairment risk, and no hidden overpayment risk. Very rare among mega-caps of this scale.
The 84.4% debt ratio is elevated by design — Apple uses low-cost debt to fund buybacks rather than repatriating overseas cash at higher tax rates. Long-term debt of $96.7B is easily serviceable with $108.9B annual FCF. But in a downside scenario (severe tariff escalation the 10-K warns about), the thin equity cushion leaves less margin for error.
Capital allocation scores 82/100 — one of the most shareholder-friendly capital-return programs in corporate history, with a leverage caveat. Apple generates $108.9B in FCF and returns virtually all of it through buybacks and dividends while spending just $9.4B on CapEx. The 164.4% ROE is a byproduct of deliberate leverage — the 84.4% debt ratio is aggressive but rational given the FCF engine. Zero goodwill on the balance sheet is a rare structural win. The State Aid Decision's $10.2B tax charge is a reminder that management cannot fully shield the company from evolving international tax regimes.
Key Risks
The 10-K reports Greater China net sales declined 8% to $67.0B, attributing it to 'lower net sales of iPhone and iPad' and 'the weakness in the renminbi relative to the U.S. dollar.' China is Apple's third-largest segment; an 8% decline on a $73B base is a meaningful structural signal, not just FX.
Wearables, Home and Accessories net sales declined 7% to $37.0B. This category was once pitched as Apple's next major growth vector; its sustained contraction raises market-saturation questions about Apple Watch and AirPods.
The 10-K Risk Factors state 'substantially all of the Company's manufacturing is performed in whole or in part by outsourcing partners located primarily in China mainland, India, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam.' The filing warns that 'restrictions on international trade, such as tariffs and other controls on imports or exports of goods, technology or data, can materially adversely affect the Company's business and supply chain.'
A one-time $10.2B net income tax charge 'related to the State Aid Decision' pushed FY2024 effective tax rate from 14.7% (FY2023) to 24.1%. While non-recurring, it illustrates Apple's exposure to evolving EU state-aid and OECD global minimum tax regimes — governance risks beyond management's control.
Risk profile scores 66/100 (higher = safer). The dominant risk is geographic and geopolitical: Greater China's 8% decline and the 10-K's extensive discussion of supply-chain concentration in tariff-exposed jurisdictions frame Apple's single biggest structural vulnerability. The Wearables category is contracting for the second consecutive year. The 84.4% debt ratio is manageable with $108.9B FCF but amplifies downside if multiple risks — tariff escalation, China weakness, Services regulation — materialize in concert. The State Aid tax charge is a reminder that international tax reform can meaningfully dent GAAP earnings.
Management
Ask about this section
Ask one question here. Keep digging when the issue needs more work.
This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.