Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) 2024 10-K Earnings Analysis
Micron Technology, Inc.2024 Earnings Analysis
68/100
Micron Technology, Inc.'s FY2024 10-K for the period ended August 29, 2024 is easiest to read through $25.1B of revenue, $778M of net income, and $121M of free cash flow. HBM3E Strategy, US Manufacturing Investment, and DRAM Oligopoly remain the clearest way to understand where the economics come from and why margin durability looks different here than it would at a generic peer. Gross margin was 22.4% and operating margin was 5.2%, so FY2024 does not look like a year bought with weak pricing or loose cost control. The next test is whether HBM Competitive Dynamics and China CAC Action stay manageable without compromising returns.
Filing analysis
Micron Technology, Inc. 2024 10-K Analysis
This page reads Micron Technology, Inc.'s 2024 10-K annual report through the EarningsMoat framework: earnings quality, economic moat strength, capital allocation, and key risks. The current overall score is 68/100, or grade D.
MU Earnings Quality
The earnings-quality module scores 65/100, with Gross Margin: 22.4%, Operating Margin: 5.2%. The core question is whether reported profit is backed by operating cash flow and recurring business economics. See the earnings quality analysis guide.
MU Economic Moat Analysis
The moat-strength module scores 78/100, with DRAM Oligopoly: 3-player, HBM Capacity: AI tailwind. The test is whether the advantage can protect returns after competitors react. Read the economic moat analysis guide.
MU Free Cash Flow vs Net Income
CF/Net Income: 10.9x is the fastest read on whether accounting earnings turn into cash. The capital-allocation module scores 65/100. For the diagnostic, start with cash flow vs net income.
MU Key Risks from the Annual Report
The risk module scores 62/100, with Memory Cycle Volatility: Structural, HBM Competitive Dynamics: SK Hynix lead. The goal is to separate ordinary disclosure from risks that can change margins, cash flow, leverage, or the moat itself.
Is MU a High Quality Earnings Stock?
Based on this 2024 filing, MU needs a closer read before it qualifies as a high-quality earnings candidate: the overall grade is D, and the earnings-quality score is 65/100. This is a research screen, not investment advice.
Read the report first
Understand Micron Technology, Inc. first, then decide if it belongs on your watchlist
The MU score, explanation, management facts, and filing sources are all here. When you want to follow more companies, review new-filing changes, or keep notes for the next review, keep more names in your watchlist.
Read the report first
Understand the company first. Keep up with every filing as your list grows.
A single report helps you judge one company. As your watchlist grows, review score, cash flow, moat, and risk changes together instead of repeating the same work.
Keep more names together
When your list grows, keep MU with the rest of your names and review score, grade, and risk changes over time.
See how to track more namesAsk follow-up questions
Dig into cash conversion, moat evidence, capital allocation, and risk changes without rereading the full 10-K.
Ask a questionExport and revisit records
Save the MU report as research notes you can revisit before the next filing.
Save research notesCore Dimension Scores
Evaluating competitive strength across earnings quality, moat strength, and risk sustainability
Overall Score Trend
Earnings Quality
Per the fiscal 2024 10-K income statement, gross margin of 22.4% reflects the memory cycle recovery dynamics — DRAM and NAND pricing improved through FY2024 per the segment-revenue disclosures, but margins remain below historical peaks per the cycle-history data.
Per the fiscal 2024 10-K income statement, operating margin of 5.2% reflects mid-cycle recovery — the Compute and Networking, Storage, Mobile, and Embedded business unit mix per the segment footnote.
Per the fiscal 2024 cash flow statement, OCF of $8.5B is 10.9x net income of $0.78B — the wide spread driven by sizable depreciation on the memory-fab footprint plus deferred-tax effects per the cash-flow reconciliation.
Per the fiscal 2024 MD&A and industry-analyst memory-pricing coverage (TrendForce, DRAMeXchange), DRAM and NAND pricing recovered from the FY2023 trough through FY2024. HBM demand from AI training and inference workloads has been the disclosed strategic mix shift tailwind.
FY2024 10-K shows $778M of net income on $25.1B of revenue, but the cleaner read is the $8.51B of operating cash flow that turned into $121M of free cash flow. HBM3E Strategy and US Manufacturing Investment help explain why the margin profile stayed where it did instead of collapsing with every demand wobble. Operating margin landed at 5.2%, while capex ran at 33.4% of revenue. Reported profit is converting into cash at a healthy rate, which reduces the odds that the FY2024 result is being flattered by accruals.
Moat Strength
Per the FY2024 10-K business description and industry-analyst DRAM share data, the global DRAM market is structurally consolidated among Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron per TrendForce quarterly share tables. The three-player structure reflects multi-decade industry consolidation through prior bankruptcies and combinations.
Per the FY2024 MD&A and Micron's HBM-product communications, Micron's HBM3E capacity has been substantially allocated through 2024 and 2025 as described in the customer and capacity commitment communications. HBM is the highest-margin DRAM-product variant per industry-analyst pricing data.
Per industry-analyst NAND share data (TrendForce), the NAND market includes Samsung, SK Hynix (including Solidigm acquired from Intel), Micron, Kioxia (formerly Toshiba), and Western Digital — a five-player structure with Micron in the middle of the share table. Less consolidation than DRAM.
Goodwill of $1.1B on $69B assets equals 1.7% per the fiscal 2024 balance sheet — minimal, reflecting principally organic growth without major M&A.
The competitive position starts with HBM3E Strategy and US Manufacturing Investment, not with a vague appeal to scale. DRAM Oligopoly and HBM Capacity matter because they deepen switching friction, expand installed-base economics, or widen route to market reach. FY2024 ROE was 1.7%, but the more important check is that cash generation and margins still support the operating story. That does not make the business immune; it means the next competitor has to overcome a functioning operating system rather than just a familiar name.
Capital Allocation
Per the fiscal 2024 cash flow statement, capex of $8.4B equals 33.5% of revenue — the peak investment cycle for the memory cycle recovery period. HBM, DRAM, and NAND capacity expansion plus the disclosed Idaho and New York US manufacturing site investment underlie the high capex.
Per the fiscal 2024 cash flow statement, FCF of approximately zero (OCF $8.5B minus capex $8.4B) reflects the high-capex cycle. FCF expansion depends on operating-margin recovery as memory-pricing cycle continues through FY2025 per management's investor communications.
Per the December 2024 US Commerce Department CHIPS Act direct funding award announcement, Micron was awarded approximately $6.165B of CHIPS Act direct funding tied to Idaho (Boise fab expansion) and New York (Clay, Onondaga County mega-fab) manufacturing investments. Disbursement is milestone-based per the announcement.
Per the fiscal 2024 capital-return disclosures, Micron pays a modest quarterly cash dividend per the dividend-history disclosure. Share repurchases have been opportunistic rather than systematic given the cycle-investment posture.
$121M of free cash flow is the starting point for the capital-allocation discussion, because it defines how much room management actually had after funding the business. Capex running at 33.4% of revenue means asset upkeep and capacity decisions remain a central part of the investment case. $7.04B of cash against $11.3B of debt means the balance sheet depends on steady cash generation rather than on idle liquidity. The capital-return file is split between the dividend and share repurchases, with room for both as long as cash generation stays near the current level.
Key Risks
Per the fiscal 2024 Risk Factors and historical 10-K cycle disclosures, memory pricing has historically been highly cyclical — peak to trough revenue and margin swings are a structural feature of the DRAM and NAND markets per industry-analyst long-term cycle data.
Per the fiscal 2024 Risk Factors and industry-analyst HBM coverage, SK Hynix has held the leading HBM share position across HBM2E and HBM3 generations per TrendForce data. Micron's HBM3E qualification with NVIDIA per public-customer disclosures is the disclosed share-growth path.
Per the FY2024 Risk Factors and BIS public communications, US and allied country export controls on advanced memory equipment and certain memory products to China affect the Micron operating environment. Successive BIS rule rounds have evolved the framework per Federal Register publications.
Per the May 2023 China Cyberspace Administration (CAC) public announcement, Micron memory products were banned from China critical information infrastructure procurement. The disclosed business impact has been quantified in successive 10-Q and 10-K disclosures.
The risk section is better read as a set of operating tradeoffs than as one binary red flag. Pressure in one part of the model can travel into margins and cash conversion faster than the headline score suggests. Balance-sheet risk is manageable on paper, so most of the real watch items sit in execution, mix, and demand rather than in accounting optics. The next test is whether HBM Competitive Dynamics and China CAC Action stay manageable without compromising returns.
Management
Ask about this section
Ask one question here. Keep digging when the issue needs more work.
This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.