Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) 2024 10-K Earnings Analysis
Analog Devices, Inc.2024 Earnings Analysis
79/100
Analog Devices, Inc. entered FY2024 with a business model defined more by operating discipline than by financial engineering, and the filing for the period ended November 2, 2024 still points in that direction: $9.43B of revenue, $1.64B of net income, and $3.12B of free cash flow. In-House + Foundry Model, Auto / EV Cycle, and Foundry + Geopolitical remain the clearest way to understand where the economics come from and why margin durability looks different here than it would at a generic peer. Gross margin was 57.1% and operating margin was 21.6%, so FY2024 does not look like a year bought with weak pricing or loose cost control. Management's job now is to keep Auto / EV Cycle and Foundry + Geopolitical from becoming margin problems.
Filing analysis
Analog Devices, Inc. 2024 10-K Analysis
This page reads Analog Devices, Inc.'s 2024 10-K annual report through the EarningsMoat framework: earnings quality, economic moat strength, capital allocation, and key risks. The current overall score is 79/100, or grade C.
ADI Earnings Quality
The earnings-quality module scores 80/100, with Gross Margin: 57.1%, Operating Margin: 21.6%. The core question is whether reported profit is backed by operating cash flow and recurring business economics. See the earnings quality analysis guide.
ADI Economic Moat Analysis
The moat-strength module scores 84/100, with Long Product Life: Multi-decade, Maxim Integration: Combined portfolio. The test is whether the advantage can protect returns after competitors react. Read the economic moat analysis guide.
ADI Free Cash Flow vs Net Income
CF/Net Income: 2.36x is the fastest read on whether accounting earnings turn into cash. The capital-allocation module scores 83/100. For the diagnostic, start with cash flow vs net income.
ADI Key Risks from the Annual Report
The risk module scores 70/100, with Industrial Cycle: Down-phase, Auto/EV Cycle: BMS + sensors. The goal is to separate ordinary disclosure from risks that can change margins, cash flow, leverage, or the moat itself.
Is ADI a High Quality Earnings Stock?
Based on this 2024 filing, ADI passes the first screen for high-quality earnings: the overall grade is C, and the earnings-quality score is 80/100. This is a research screen, not investment advice.
Read the report first
Understand Analog Devices, Inc. first, then decide if it belongs on your watchlist
The ADI score, explanation, management facts, and filing sources are all here. When you want to follow more companies, review new-filing changes, or keep notes for the next review, keep more names in your watchlist.
Read the report first
Understand the company first. Keep up with every filing as your list grows.
A single report helps you judge one company. As your watchlist grows, review score, cash flow, moat, and risk changes together instead of repeating the same work.
Keep more names together
When your list grows, keep ADI with the rest of your names and review score, grade, and risk changes over time.
See how to track more namesAsk follow-up questions
Dig into cash conversion, moat evidence, capital allocation, and risk changes without rereading the full 10-K.
Ask a questionExport and revisit records
Save the ADI report as research notes you can revisit before the next filing.
Save research notesCore Dimension Scores
Evaluating competitive strength across earnings quality, moat strength, and risk sustainability
Overall Score Trend
Earnings Quality
Gross Margin matters here because gross margin of 57.1% reflects the analog and mixed signal semiconductor cost structure with the disclosed long product life cycle catalog economics.
A better way to read operating margin is to notice that operating margin of 21.6% reflects acquired-intangible amortization on the Maxim portfolio (still flowing through D&A) plus current-cycle revenue dynamics per MD&A.
CF / Net Income is not just a statistic here; it shows that OCF of $3.9B is 2.36x net income of $1.64B — the wide spread driven by Maxim acquisition era intangible amortization plus standard D&A on the in-house manufacturing footprint.
The significance of end-market mix in FY2024 is that video) following. Industrial typically carries higher margin per the segment-level reporting.
The earnings file is readable because margins and cash are pointing in the same direction: 57.1% gross margin, 21.6% operating margin, and 2.36x cash conversion. The mix around In-House + Foundry Model and Auto / EV Cycle kept the economics intact even while end-market conditions stayed uneven. 21.6% operating margin and 7.7% capex intensity are a coherent pair for this business model. Reported profit is converting into cash at a healthy rate, which reduces the odds that the FY2024 result is being flattered by accruals.
Moat Strength
The practical value of long product life is that creating durable revenue visibility.
Maxim Integration helps explain why the all-stock acquisition combined Maxim's power-management and other analog products into the ADI portfolio. Combined-product cross-selling and portfolio-rationalization progress is disclosed in successive earnings communications.
Read catalog breadth as evidence that and power-management products serving hundreds of thousands of customer accounts per investor-day materials — breadth analogous to Texas Instruments per industry-analyst coverage.
Goodwill / Assets is useful mainly because goodwill of $26.9B on $48B assets equals 55.8% per the fiscal 2024 balance sheet — concentrated as a direct consequence of the 2021 Maxim acquisition (~$21B all-stock per the closing press release) plus the 2017 Linear Technology acquisition that preceded it.
A better way to frame the moat question is to start with In-House + Foundry Model and Auto / EV Cycle. The picture gets stronger once Foundry + Geopolitical and CapEx Cycle are added, because they make the advantage broader than one single product cycle. The numbers back the qualitative case: 4.6% ROE and solid cash generation are showing up in the same year. The conclusion is not invincibility. It is that the next rival still has to beat a real workflow advantage.
Capital Allocation
Free Cash Flow tells you that FCF of $3.1B (OCF $3.9B minus capex $0.73B) supports the multi-year dividend-increase record disclosed in the dividend-history section.
The reason to focus on dividend growth is that ADI has raised its dividend across multiple years. The dividend-increase pace is communicated in quarterly earnings press releases.
CapEx Cycle matters in capital allocation because $0.73B capex on $9.4B revenue equals 7.8% — elevated relative to fabless analog peers, reflecting ADI's hybrid in house plus foundry manufacturing model. Capacity expansion is disclosed in investor-day materials.
The allocation takeaway from maxim synergy capture is that ADI has communicated multi-year Maxim-related cost and revenue synergy targets. Capture progress is disclosed in successive quarterly earnings communications.
The allocation question begins with $3.12B of free cash flow, not with headline EPS. The company still spends enough on capex at 7.7% of revenue that maintenance and growth discipline matter. Cash at $1.99B does not erase debt at $7.58B, so the balance sheet still leans on a durable cash engine. Both the dividend and repurchases remain in play, so capital allocation is balanced rather than one-dimensional.
Key Risks
Industrial Cycle matters as a risk because the industrial-semiconductor cycle has been in inventory-correction mode through the FY2024 period. Recovery cadence is tracked alongside Texas Instruments and other analog peers per industry-analyst coverage.
What auto / ev cycle adds to the risk case is that ADI serves battery management system (BMS) and other automotive content; EV-volume cadence affects the BMS revenue trajectory disclosed in supplemental tables.
Goodwill Concentration is worth tracking because $26.9B goodwill concentrates impairment risk on the Maxim and Linear Technology reporting units. Impairment testing follows the FY2024 10-K accounting-policy section.
The risk significance of foundry + geopolitical is that ADI's hybrid manufacturing model includes foundry partnerships (notably TSMC for advanced nodes per public-disclosure communications) plus internal fabs. China end customer exposure within the analog category is tracked in geographic-revenue disclosures.
The filing points to a cluster of risks rather than one neat red flag. A modest operating miss can still show up in margins and cash faster than investors expect. The balance sheet adds its own watch item because goodwill is 55.8% of assets. Management's job now is to keep Auto / EV Cycle and Foundry + Geopolitical from becoming margin problems.
Management
Ask about this section
Ask one question here. Keep digging when the issue needs more work.
This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.