SLB LIMITED/NV (SLB) 2025 10-K Earnings Analysis
SLB LIMITED/NV2025 Earnings Analysis
66/100
FY2024 → FY2025 Year-over-Year
vs prior annual reportIn FY2025, SLB LIMITED/NV's free cash flow grew 2.7% to $4.8B, while overall score dropped 13 to 66 and net income declined 24.4% to $3.4B.
SLB's FY2025 10-K reveals the world's leading oilfield services company with evolving digital ambitions: $35.7B revenue, $3.4B net income (9.4% net margin), and $6.5B OCF demonstrate solid cash generation from a technology-intensive services platform. FCF of $4.8B ($6.5B OCF minus $1.7B capex) confirms the business model generates substantial free cash. The moat is moderate — SLB's technology leadership (Delfi/Lumi platforms, Petrel software) and global scale in 100+ countries create switching costs, but oilfield services ultimately depends on E&P customer spending driven by commodity prices. The 52.4% debt ratio and $16.8B goodwill (30.6% of assets) from the Aker/Cameron acquisitions are notable.
Filing analysis
SLB LIMITED/NV 2025 10-K Analysis
This page reads SLB LIMITED/NV's 2025 10-K annual report through the EarningsMoat framework: earnings quality, economic moat strength, capital allocation, and key risks. The current overall score is 66/100, or grade D.
SLB Earnings Quality
The earnings-quality module scores 72/100, with Operating Cash Flow: $6.5B, Free Cash Flow: $4.8B. The core question is whether reported profit is backed by operating cash flow and recurring business economics. See the earnings quality analysis guide.
SLB Economic Moat Analysis
The moat-strength module scores 65/100, with Technology Leadership: 80/100, Global Scale: 100+ countries. The test is whether the advantage can protect returns after competitors react. Read the economic moat analysis guide.
SLB Free Cash Flow vs Net Income
Operating Cash Flow: $6.5B, Free Cash Flow: $4.8B is the fastest read on whether accounting earnings turn into cash. The capital-allocation module scores 70/100. For the diagnostic, start with cash flow vs net income.
SLB Key Risks from the Annual Report
The risk module scores 55/100, with E&P Spending Cyclicality: High, Energy Transition: Medium. The goal is to separate ordinary disclosure from risks that can change margins, cash flow, leverage, or the moat itself.
Is SLB a High Quality Earnings Stock?
Based on this 2025 filing, SLB needs a closer read before it qualifies as a high-quality earnings candidate: the overall grade is D, and the earnings-quality score is 72/100. This is a research screen, not investment advice.
Read the report first
Understand SLB LIMITED/NV first, then decide if it belongs on your watchlist
The SLB score, explanation, management facts, and filing sources are all here. When you want to follow more companies, review new-filing changes, or keep notes for the next review, keep more names in your watchlist.
Read the report first
Understand the company first. Keep up with every filing as your list grows.
A single report helps you judge one company. As your watchlist grows, review score, cash flow, moat, and risk changes together instead of repeating the same work.
Keep more names together
When your list grows, keep SLB with the rest of your names and review score, grade, and risk changes over time.
See how to track more namesAsk follow-up questions
Dig into cash conversion, moat evidence, capital allocation, and risk changes without rereading the full 10-K.
Ask a questionExport and revisit records
Save the SLB report as research notes you can revisit before the next filing.
Save research notesCore Dimension Scores
Evaluating competitive strength across earnings quality, moat strength, and risk sustainability
Overall Score Trend
Earnings Quality
OCF of $6.5B on $35.7B revenue (18.2% OCF margin) demonstrates strong cash generation from SLB's technology and services platform. The 1.92x CF/NI ratio ($6.5B/$3.4B) reflects substantial depreciation on the capital-intensive equipment base and amortization of acquired intangibles.
FCF of $4.8B ($6.5B OCF minus $1.7B capex) on a 4.7% capex/revenue ratio demonstrates capital efficiency for an equipment-intensive services business. The FCF yield is strong and supports dividends, buybacks, and debt reduction.
ROE of 12.9% on $26.1B equity reflects adequate returns for an asset-heavy services company. The 52.4% debt ratio with $9.7B long-term debt provides moderate leverage. Returns are cyclically dependent on E&P spending levels.
Goodwill of $16.8B represents 30.6% of $54.9B total assets, primarily from the Cameron and Aker Solutions acquisitions. This creates impairment risk if oil services demand contracts significantly or if acquired businesses underperform.
Earnings quality scores 72/100 — SLB generates strong cash ($4.8B FCF) with solid OCF margins, but the 30.6% goodwill and cyclical dependence on E&P spending temper the quality score. The 1.92x CF/NI ratio is primarily depreciation-driven rather than an earnings quality red flag.
Moat Strength
SLB's Digital division includes the Delfi and Lumi cloud platforms, Petrel reservoir modeling software, and AI/ML-powered digital operations. The 10-K describes 'autonomous drilling to automated well intervention' capabilities. This technology stack creates meaningful switching costs as operators integrate SLB's digital tools into their workflows.
The 10-K states SLB has 'a global presence in more than 100 countries and employees representing almost twice as many nationalities.' This unmatched geographic footprint enables SLB to serve international NOCs and IOCs wherever they operate, creating a scale advantage that Halliburton and Baker Hughes cannot fully match.
Despite technology and scale advantages, SLB's revenue is ultimately tied to upstream E&P spending driven by oil and gas prices. The 10-K discusses 'energy innovation for a balanced planet' and energy transition strategy, but near-term revenue depends on fossil fuel investment cycles.
Moat strength scores 65/100 — SLB has a moderate moat built on technology leadership (Petrel, Delfi, digital operations) and global scale (100+ countries). However, the oilfield services industry is inherently cyclical, and the moat cannot protect against E&P spending downturns driven by commodity price declines.
Capital Allocation
Capital expenditure of $1.7B on $35.7B revenue (4.7%) is remarkably efficient for an equipment-intensive oilfield services company. The $4.8B resulting FCF demonstrates SLB's ability to generate cash well in excess of maintenance capital requirements.
SLB's four-division structure (Digital, Reservoir Performance, Well Construction, Production Systems) reflects a strategic shift toward higher-margin digital services. The Digital division — with SaaS subscriptions, cloud platforms, and AI capabilities — aims to create more recurring, less cyclical revenue streams.
Total debt ratio of 52.4% with $9.7B long-term debt is moderate for the industry. The $4.8B annual FCF provides significant deleveraging capacity. SLB has been reducing debt while maintaining dividends and buybacks.
Capital allocation scores 70/100 — SLB demonstrates efficient capital deployment with 4.7% capex intensity and $4.8B FCF. The strategic shift toward digital services is well-conceived. Moderate leverage with strong deleveraging trajectory supports the balance sheet.
Key Risks
SLB's revenue is directly tied to upstream oil and gas spending. OPEC production decisions, commodity price declines, and capital discipline by E&P operators can all compress demand for oilfield services regardless of SLB's technology advantages.
Long-term decarbonization trends could reduce fossil fuel investment. SLB positions itself for energy transition with 'new energy systems that accelerate the energy transition' and carbon management capabilities, but the core business remains tied to hydrocarbon production.
Operating in 100+ countries exposes SLB to sanctions, political instability, and contract risks. Revenue concentration in the Middle East and international markets creates geopolitical vulnerabilities that domestic-focused competitors avoid.
Key risks score 55/100 (moderate concern) — E&P spending cyclicality is the dominant risk, amplified by energy transition headwinds and geopolitical exposure. SLB's technology and digital strategy provide partial mitigation, but the core business cannot escape its dependence on upstream investment cycles.
Management
Ask about this section
Ask one question here. Keep digging when the issue needs more work.
This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.