INTUIT INC. (INTU) 2025 10-K Earnings Analysis
INTUIT INC.2025 Earnings Analysis
75/100
FY2024 → FY2025 Year-over-Year
vs prior annual reportIn FY2025, INTUIT INC.'s net income grew 30.6% to $3.9B and free cash flow grew 30.5% to $6.1B, while overall score dropped 8 to 75.
Intuit's FY2025 (ending Jul 2025) 10-K shows a near-perfect software economics machine: 100% reported gross margin on $18.8B revenue, $6.1B FCF with minimal $84M capex, and 19.6% ROE. The TurboTax-QuickBooks-Credit Karma-Mailchimp ecosystem creates formidable switching costs for 100M+ consumers and small businesses. The moat is widening as AI-powered tax and accounting workflows deepen lock-in, though 37.8% goodwill-to-assets from the Credit Karma and Mailchimp acquisitions warrants monitoring.
Filing analysis
INTUIT INC. 2025 10-K Analysis
This page reads INTUIT INC.'s 2025 10-K annual report through the EarningsMoat framework: earnings quality, economic moat strength, capital allocation, and key risks. The current overall score is 75/100, or grade C.
INTU Earnings Quality
The earnings-quality module scores 90/100, with Gross Margin: ~100%, CF/Net Income: 1.60x. The core question is whether reported profit is backed by operating cash flow and recurring business economics. See the earnings quality analysis guide.
INTU Economic Moat Analysis
The moat-strength module scores 88/100, with Switching Costs: 90/100, Network Effects: 75/100. The test is whether the advantage can protect returns after competitors react. Read the economic moat analysis guide.
INTU Free Cash Flow vs Net Income
CF/Net Income: 1.60x, Free Cash Flow: $6.1B is the fastest read on whether accounting earnings turn into cash. The capital-allocation module scores 85/100. For the diagnostic, start with cash flow vs net income.
INTU Key Risks from the Annual Report
The risk module scores 35/100, with Regulatory/Free-File Risk: High, AI Disruption: Moderate. The goal is to separate ordinary disclosure from risks that can change margins, cash flow, leverage, or the moat itself.
Is INTU a High Quality Earnings Stock?
Based on this 2025 filing, INTU passes the first screen for high-quality earnings: the overall grade is C, and the earnings-quality score is 90/100. This is a research screen, not investment advice.
Read the report first
Understand INTUIT INC. first, then decide if it belongs on your watchlist
The INTU score, explanation, management facts, and filing sources are all here. When you want to follow more companies, review new-filing changes, or keep notes for the next review, keep more names in your watchlist.
Read the report first
Understand the company first. Keep up with every filing as your list grows.
A single report helps you judge one company. As your watchlist grows, review score, cash flow, moat, and risk changes together instead of repeating the same work.
Keep more names together
When your list grows, keep INTU with the rest of your names and review score, grade, and risk changes over time.
See how to track more namesAsk follow-up questions
Dig into cash conversion, moat evidence, capital allocation, and risk changes without rereading the full 10-K.
Ask a questionExport and revisit records
Save the INTU report as research notes you can revisit before the next filing.
Save research notesCore Dimension Scores
Evaluating competitive strength across earnings quality, moat strength, and risk sustainability
Overall Score Trend
Earnings Quality
Reported gross margin is effectively 100% ($18.8B GP on $18.8B revenue), reflecting a pure software/SaaS model where cost of revenue is classified below gross profit. This is the signature of a digital-only business with near-zero marginal cost of delivery.
Operating cash flow of $6.2B against net income of $3.9B yields a 1.60x conversion ratio — outstanding cash generation exceeding reported earnings by 60%. The gap reflects stock-based compensation addbacks and deferred revenue from subscriptions collected upfront.
Free cash flow of $6.1B with just $84M in capex demonstrates an ultra-asset-light model. The 32.5% FCF margin on $18.8B revenue is elite among software companies, driven by the subscription model's predictability and the near-zero infrastructure cost of delivering tax and accounting software.
Goodwill of $14.0B represents 37.8% of $37.0B total assets, primarily from the Credit Karma ($7.1B, 2020) and Mailchimp ($12B, 2021) acquisitions. While both have been successfully integrated, the elevated goodwill introduces impairment risk if these platforms underperform.
Earnings quality scores 90/100 — among the highest-quality earnings profiles in software. The ~100% gross margin, 1.60x CF/NI conversion, and $6.1B FCF on just $84M capex represent textbook software economics. Intuit's subscription-driven model generates predictable, high-quality cash flows that substantially exceed reported net income. The only blemish is 37.8% goodwill from acquisitions, but both Credit Karma and Mailchimp are generating meaningful revenue contributions.
Moat Strength
TurboTax stores years of tax history; QuickBooks holds the financial records of millions of small businesses. Switching costs are extraordinarily high because migrating accounting data, chart of accounts, integrations with banks and payroll processors, and years of tax filing history creates massive friction for both consumers and SMBs.
Credit Karma (100M+ members) creates data-driven network effects: more users generate more financial data, enabling better product matching for credit cards, loans, and insurance. The QuickBooks ecosystem connects small businesses with accountants, payment processors, and lenders, creating multi-sided platform dynamics.
Intuit has consistently raised prices across TurboTax, QuickBooks, and Mailchimp with minimal churn. The company's near-100% gross margin and 19.6% ROE confirm that customers absorb price increases — tax compliance is non-discretionary and switching accounting platforms is prohibitively costly for SMBs.
Moat strength scores 88/100 — a wide moat built on switching costs, data advantages, and regulatory complexity. Tax law complexity ensures ongoing demand for TurboTax; small business accounting inertia protects QuickBooks; and Credit Karma's 100M+ user base creates proprietary financial data that is difficult to replicate. The AI-powered features in TurboTax and QuickBooks are deepening the moat by increasing product stickiness.
Capital Allocation
Capital expenditure of $84M on $18.8B revenue yields a 0.4% capital intensity — one of the lowest in the S&P 500. Virtually all operating cash flow converts to free cash flow ($6.1B of $6.2B OCF), reflecting the pure software delivery model.
Total debt ratio of 46.7% with $6.0B in long-term debt is conservative for a company generating $6.1B in annual FCF. Debt-to-FCF of approximately 1.0x means Intuit could theoretically retire all debt within one year of free cash flow — a very comfortable position.
ROE of 19.6% on $19.7B equity reflects solid returns on a relatively unleveraged equity base. Unlike many tech peers that inflate ROE through massive buybacks reducing equity, Intuit's $19.7B equity base is substantial, making the 19.6% ROE genuinely reflective of business economics.
Capital allocation scores 85/100 — disciplined, efficient, and shareholder-friendly. The 0.4% capex ratio is the gold standard for software economics. Debt management is conservative at 46.7%, and the 19.6% ROE on substantial equity demonstrates genuine value creation. Intuit allocates capital across dividends, buybacks, and strategic acquisitions (Credit Karma, Mailchimp) that have expanded the addressable market.
Key Risks
The IRS Direct File program poses an existential long-term threat to TurboTax by offering free federal tax filing directly from the government. If Direct File expands to all 50 states and adds state filing capability, it could erode TurboTax's addressable market for simple returns — the high-volume, entry-point segment.
While Intuit is investing heavily in AI (Intuit Assist), the democratization of AI creates risk from new entrants that could offer AI-powered tax and bookkeeping at lower price points. The moat's durability depends on Intuit embedding AI deeply enough to increase switching costs rather than commoditize the product.
Intuit derives the majority of its revenue from U.S. consumers and small businesses, with significant seasonality around tax season (January-April). Geographic concentration in the U.S. and temporal concentration in Q3 (fiscal) create lumpy cash flow patterns and vulnerability to U.S.-specific regulatory changes.
Key risks score 35/100 — the IRS Direct File program is the most material long-term threat, potentially commoditizing simple tax preparation. AI disruption cuts both ways: Intuit is well-positioned to leverage AI but also faces the risk that AI lowers barriers for new entrants. Geographic and seasonal concentration in U.S. tax filing adds cyclicality risk.
Management
Ask about this section
Ask one question here. Keep digging when the issue needs more work.
This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.