Skip to content
A newer analysis is available for FY2025. View the latest report →

Halliburton Company (HAL) 2024 10-K Earnings Analysis

By DouyaLast reviewed: 2026-04-27How we score

Halliburton Company2024 Earnings Analysis

HAL|US|Quality · Moat · Risks
C

75/100

Halliburton Company's FY2024 numbers are straightforward on the surface but more interesting underneath: $22.9B of revenue, $2.50B of net income, 0.0% gross margin, and $2.42B of free cash flow. Big-3 Oilfield Services, Pressure-Pumping Leadership, and Pressure-Pumping Pricing remain the clearest way to understand where the economics come from and why margin durability looks different here than it would at a generic peer. Big-3 Oilfield Services helped keep gross margin at 0.0% and operating margin at 16.7%, so the economics still look earned. What matters next is whether Pressure-Pumping Pricing and Energy Transition Long-Tail stay contained at the same time.

Filing analysis

Halliburton Company 2024 10-K Analysis

This page reads Halliburton Company's 2024 10-K annual report through the EarningsMoat framework: earnings quality, economic moat strength, capital allocation, and key risks. The current overall score is 75/100, or grade C.

HAL Earnings Quality

The earnings-quality module scores 75/100, with Operating Margin: 16.7%, CF/Net Income: 1.55x. The core question is whether reported profit is backed by operating cash flow and recurring business economics. See the earnings quality analysis guide.

HAL Economic Moat Analysis

The moat-strength module scores 78/100, with North American Position: Pressure-pumping leader, Big-3 Oilfield Services: With SLB/BKR. The test is whether the advantage can protect returns after competitors react. Read the economic moat analysis guide.

HAL Free Cash Flow vs Net Income

CF/Net Income: 1.55x, Free Cash Flow: $2.42B is the fastest read on whether accounting earnings turn into cash. The capital-allocation module scores 78/100. For the diagnostic, start with cash flow vs net income.

HAL Key Risks from the Annual Report

The risk module scores 68/100, with North America Cycle: Drilling-activity sensitivity, Pressure-Pumping Pricing: Capacity-overhang cycle. The goal is to separate ordinary disclosure from risks that can change margins, cash flow, leverage, or the moat itself.

Is HAL a High Quality Earnings Stock?

Based on this 2024 filing, HAL needs a closer read before it qualifies as a high-quality earnings candidate: the overall grade is C, and the earnings-quality score is 75/100. This is a research screen, not investment advice.

Read the report first

Understand Halliburton Company first, then decide if it belongs on your watchlist

The HAL score, explanation, management facts, and filing sources are all here. When you want to follow more companies, review new-filing changes, or keep notes for the next review, keep more names in your watchlist.

Read the report first

Understand the company first. Keep up with every filing as your list grows.

A single report helps you judge one company. As your watchlist grows, review score, cash flow, moat, and risk changes together instead of repeating the same work.

Watchlist companies0 / 5
Research notes leftSign in to track

Keep more names together

When your list grows, keep HAL with the rest of your names and review score, grade, and risk changes over time.

See how to track more names

Ask follow-up questions

Dig into cash conversion, moat evidence, capital allocation, and risk changes without rereading the full 10-K.

Ask a question

Export and revisit records

Save the HAL report as research notes you can revisit before the next filing.

Save research notes

Core Dimension Scores

Evaluating competitive strength across earnings quality, moat strength, and risk sustainability

Earnings Quality
75/100
There is enough internal consistency in FY2024 to trust the ...
Moat Strength
78/100
The filing points first to Big-3 Oilfield Services and Press...
Capital Allocation
78/100
Once capex was covered, the business still produced $2.42B o...
Key Risks
68/100
The practical risk frame for FY2024 is Pressure-Pumping Pric...

Overall Score Trend

📊

Earnings Quality

75/100
Operating Margin
16.7%

A better way to read operating margin is to notice that the 16.7% operating margin reflects the disclosed dual-segment economics — completion and drilling services mix per the segment-disclosure.

CF/Net Income
1.55x

CF / Net Income is not just a statistic here; it shows that OCF of $3.87B is 1.55x net income of $2.50B — reflecting depreciation per the cash-flow reconciliation.

Free Cash Flow
$2.42B

The significance of free cash flow in FY2024 is that FCF of $2.42B (OCF $3.87B minus capex $1.44B) supports the disclosed dividend and share-repurchase program.

There is enough internal consistency in FY2024 to trust the numbers: $2.50B of net income, $2.42B of free cash flow, and 0.0% gross margin all fit together. Big-3 Oilfield Services sits close enough to the core workflow that it supports both margin retention and cash conversion, and Pressure-Pumping Leadership reinforces that pattern. That left the company with 16.7% operating margin before capital allocation choices came into view. The clean cash conversion tied to Big-3 Oilfield Services means the accounting result is not standing alone.

🏰

Moat Strength

78/100
North American Position
Pressure-pumping leader

North American Position helps explain why halliburton holds a leading North American oilfield-services position per public industry rankings — particularly in pressure-pumping (per the disclosed product-line communications).

Big-3 Oilfield Services
With SLB/BKR

Read big-3 oilfield services as evidence that halliburton is one of the three major global oilfield services providers per public industry communications — alongside SLB (Schlumberger) and Baker Hughes per the disclosed competitive landscape.

International Expansion
Diversification strategy

International Expansion is useful mainly because halliburton's international-segment expansion (Middle East and Latin America focus per the disclosed regional-revenue trajectory) provides diversification beyond North American cycle exposure.

The filing points first to Big-3 Oilfield Services and Pressure-Pumping Leadership when you ask why customers do not switch casually. Pressure-Pumping Pricing and Energy Transition Long-Tail show that the advantage is reinforced by adjacent capabilities rather than isolated in one corner of the portfolio. It helps that the FY2024 numbers do not fight the story: Big-3 Oilfield Services still supported 23.8% ROE alongside a readable cash profile. Per the FY2024 annual report and company disclosures, a rival can still win share, but it has to break an embedded process built around Big-3 Oilfield Services rather than only undercut a list price.

💰

Capital Allocation

78/100
Free Cash Flow
$2.42B

The reason to focus on free cash flow is that FCF of $2.42B supports the disclosed dividend and share-repurchase program.

Active Buybacks
Multi-year program

Active Buybacks matters in capital allocation because halliburton has executed sustained share-repurchase per the disclosed multi-year buyback-authorization communications.

Net Debt Position
$4.54B

The allocation takeaway from net debt position is that long-term debt of $7.16B against $2.62B cash equals net debt of $4.54B per the disclosed capital-structure footnote — manageable per the disclosed credit-rating communications.

Once capex was covered, the business still produced $2.42B of free cash flow, which is the real source of optionality around Big-3 Oilfield Services and the rest of the file. Capex intensity of 6.3% of revenue keeps management from treating all operating cash flow from Big-3 Oilfield Services as distributable. The cash cushion is real but not excessive: $2.62B against $7.16B of debt keeps the company dependent on operating follow-through. The company is returning capital through two channels at once: recurring dividends and opportunistic buybacks.

🚩

Key Risks

68/100
North America Cycle
Drilling-activity sensitivity

What north america cycle adds to the risk case is that halliburton's North America segment revenue tracks rig count and completion activity cycles per the disclosed customer-spending communications — particularly sensitive to US shale cycle dynamics.

Pressure-Pumping Pricing
Capacity-overhang cycle

Pressure-Pumping Pricing is worth tracking because pressure pumping pricing cycle has been pressured by capacity-overhang dynamics per public industry communications — pricing-discipline focus per the disclosed strategic-priority communications.

Energy Transition Long-Tail
Multi-decade

The risk significance of energy transition long-tail is that long-term energy-transition trends per public IEA data create long-term oilfield services demand exposure.

The practical risk frame for FY2024 is Pressure-Pumping Pricing plus Energy Transition Long-Tail, not one clean headline. The linkage between Pressure-Pumping Pricing, mix, and cash generation is what makes the risk file worth respecting. Most of the real risk sits in Pressure-Pumping Pricing operations and market mix rather than in accounting optics. What matters next is whether Pressure-Pumping Pricing and Energy Transition Long-Tail stay contained at the same time.

👤

Management

Facts · No Score
CEO: Jeff Miller
Per the FY2024 proxy and company transition materials, jeff Miller has served as CEO since June 2017. Prior roles per his biographical disclosure included President of Halliburton.
Big-3 Oilfield Services
Big-3 Oilfield Services helps explain why halliburton is one of the three major global oilfield services providers — alongside SLB (Schlumberger) and Baker Hughes per the disclosed competitive landscape.
Pressure-Pumping Leadership
Pressure-Pumping Leadership is one of the cleaner company-specific facts because halliburton holds a leading North American pressure-pumping position per the disclosed product-line communications.
International Expansion
International Expansion matters because halliburton's international-segment expansion (Middle East and Latin America focus) provides diversification per the disclosed regional-revenue trajectory.

Ask about this section

Ask one question here. Keep digging when the issue needs more work.

Keep asking

This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.